ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2019
Expectations regarding eHealth among women with stress urinary incontinence.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Conservative non-pharmacological interventions in women with pelvic floor dysfunction: a systematic review of qualitative studies.BMC women's health · 2022Pooled it
- The effectiveness of eHealth interventions on female pelvic floor dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International urogynecology journal · 2022Pooled it
- Barriers and Facilitators Associated With App-Based Treatment for Female Urinary Incontinence: Mixed Methods Evaluation.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2021Trial
- Patients' experiences of participating in physiotherapeutic telerehabilitation for postpartum pelvic floor dysfunction; a qualitative study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- Patients' Perceptions of Stress Urinary Incontinence Treatment: A Scoping Review of Qualitative Studies.International urogynecology journal · 2025Article
- Attitudes and Perceptions of eHealth Among Female Patients with Urinary Incontinence and Healthcare Providers: A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2025Review
- Digital Technologies for Women's Pelvic Floor Muscle Training to Manage Urinary Incontinence Across Their Life Course: Scoping Review.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2023Article
- Attitudes and barriers to pelvic floor muscle exercises of women with stress urinary incontinence.BMC women's health · 2022Article
- Telemedicine as a Tool to Improve Medicine Adherence in Patients with Affective Disorders - A Systematic Literature Review.Patient preference and adherence · 2022Review
- Women's adoption of a web-based intervention for stress urinary incontinence: a qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2021Article
- User Experiences and Preferences Regarding an App for the Treatment of Urinary Incontinence in Adult Women: Qualitative Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisStress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a common condition with a major impact on quality of life (QoL). Various factors prevent women from seeking help. However, eHealth (Internet-based therapy) with pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) is an effective and satisfying intervention for these women. We hypothesize that women with symptoms after regular therapy will profit from eHealth. This study explores the expectations regarding an eHealth intervention among women who still suffer from SUI despite treatment.
methodsA qualitative study with semistructured interviews was conducted using a grounded theory approach. The study included women with SUI who had ever sought help for their condition.
resultsThirteen women were interviewed, most whom had experience with PFMT and still suffered from moderate-to-severe incontinence. Two themes emerged from data analysis: the need to meet, and eHealth as a tool to bridge obstacles. Women greatly emphasized that a healthcare professional, preferably one they know, should be available with eHealth. Several women indicated that the absence of personal contact caused lack of trust in success. However, several women were willing to use eHealth because its anonymity and flexibility could overcome obstacles in regular care.
conclusionseHealth based on PFMT is currently not a preferable treatment modality for women who still suffer from SUI despite treatment. eHealth cannot act as a substitute for their positive experience with personal contact. Some women are willing to use eHealth because of its advantages over regular care. Future experiences with eHealth might enable women with SUI to trust digital care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.