Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30594894›Full record

ArticleMolecular therapy. Nucleic acids2019

A Simple Cloning-free Method to Efficiently Induce Gene Expression Using CRISPR/Cas9.

Lyujie Fang, Sandy S C Hung, Jennifer Yek, Layal El Wazan, Tu Nguyen, Shahnaz Khan, Shiang Y Lim, Alex W Hewitt, Raymond C B Wong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Harnessing the evolving CRISPR/Cas9 for precision oncology.Journal of translational medicine · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Methods forFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Dead Cas Systems: Types, Principles, and Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lyujie FangCentre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Sandy S C HungCentre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Jennifer YekCentre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Layal El WazanCentre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Tu NguyenCentre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Shahnaz KhanCentre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Shiang Y LimO'Brien Institute Department, St Vincent's Institute of Medical Research, Fitzroy, VIC, Australia.
Alex W HewittCentre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Menzies Institute for Medical Research, School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.
Raymond C B WongCentre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Shenzhen Eye Hospital, School of Medicine, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China. Electronic address: wongcb@unimelb.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gain-of-function studies often require the tedious cloning of transgene cDNA into vectors for overexpression beyond the physiological expression levels. The rapid development of CRISPR/Cas technology presents promising opportunities to address these issues. Here, we report a simple, cloning-free method to induce gene expression at an endogenous locus using CRISPR/Cas9 activators. Our strategy utilizes synthesized sgRNA expression cassettes to direct a nuclease-null Cas9 complex fused with transcriptional activators (VP64, p65, and Rta) for site-specific induction of endogenous genes. This strategy allows rapid initiation of gain-of-function studies in the same day. Using this approach, we tested two CRISPR activation systems, dSpCas9VPR and dSaCas9VPR, for induction of multiple genes in human and rat cells. Our results showed that both CRISPR activators allow efficient induction of six different neural development genes (CRX, RORB, RAX, OTX2, ASCL1, and NEUROD1) in human cells, whereas the rat cells exhibit more variable and less-efficient levels of gene induction, as observed in three different genes (Ascl1, Neurod1, Nrl). Altogether, this study provides a simple method to efficiently activate endogenous gene expression using CRISPR/Cas9 activators, which can be applied as a rapid workflow to initiate gain-of-function studies for a range of molecular- and cell-biology disciplines.

Indexed as

cloning freeCRISPRCRISPR activationgene activationmultiplex gene activationSaCas9SpCas9transcriptional activator

Identifiers

PMID30594894
PMCPMC6307107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.