ArticleJournal of pediatric nursing
Evaluation of a Peer-led Asthma Self-management Group Intervention for Urban Adolescents.
Article in Journal of pediatric nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Adolescent Knowledge of When to Use Inhaled Asthma Medications: Implications for Management.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2023Trial
- Long-term Effectiveness of a Peer-Led Asthma Self-management Program on Asthma Outcomes in Adolescents Living in Urban Areas: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2021Trial
- Fidelity of a peer-led asthma self-management intervention and its attention control in a multisite study of urban adolescents.Research in nursing & health · 2020Trial
- Causal relationships among self-management behaviors, symptom control, health-related quality of life and the influencing factors among Thai adolescents with asthma.International journal of nursing sciences · 2023Article
- Planning a digital intervention for adolescents with asthma (BREATHE4T): A theory-, evidence- and Person-Based Approach to identify key behavioural issues.Pediatric pulmonology · 2022Review
- Long-term effects of a peer-led asthma self-management program on asthma outcomes in adolescent peer leaders.Patient education and counseling · 2021Article
- Prioritising target non-pharmacological interventions for research in Parkinson's disease: achieving consensus from key stakeholders.Research involvement and engagement · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis paper describes the acceptability and generalizability of an evidenced-based peer-led asthma self-management program. DESIGN AND
methodsAdolescents with persistent asthma (n = 259, ages 12-17 years) from three urban cities participated in a one day camp led by either trained peer leaders (n = 35, ages 16-20 years; intervention group) or healthcare professionals (control group). Participants completed a camp evaluation form, and the peer leader quality survey.
resultsOverall program evaluation showed high acceptability with average score of 4.5 (±0.87) out of 5 and no treatment group differences were found. Campers highly rated peer leaders' qualification, particularly trustworthiness (98%), knowledge (97%), and sense of humor (95%). Participants from low income families (annual income < $30,000) reported higher satisfaction with their camp experience being enjoyable compared to their counterparts from higher income families (X
conclusionsThis study supports the acceptability and generalizability of a peer-led asthma self-management program across different urban community locations, seasons and venues. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Trained peers can be as effective as adult educators in teaching adolescents asthma self-management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.