Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30594550›Full record

ArticleEBioMedicine2019

Molecular subtyping of cancer and nomination of kinase candidates for inhibition with phosphoproteomics: Reanalysis of CPTAC ovarian cancer.

Mengsha Tong, Chunyu Yu, Dongdong Zhan, Ming Zhang, Bei Zhen, Weimin Zhu, Yi Wang, Congying Wu, Fuchu He, Jun Qin and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EBioMedicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mengsha TongSchool of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China; State Key Laboratory of Proteomics, Beijing Proteome Research Center, National Center for Protein Sciences(Beijing), Beijing Institute of Lifeomics, Beijing 102206, China.
Chunyu YuDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China; Institute of Systems Biomedicine, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China.
Dongdong ZhanState Key Laboratory of Proteomics, Beijing Proteome Research Center, National Center for Protein Sciences(Beijing), Beijing Institute of Lifeomics, Beijing 102206, China; The Center for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Regulatory Biology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences and School of Life Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China.
Ming ZhangDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China; Institute of Systems Biomedicine, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China.
Bei ZhenState Key Laboratory of Proteomics, Beijing Proteome Research Center, National Center for Protein Sciences(Beijing), Beijing Institute of Lifeomics, Beijing 102206, China.
Weimin ZhuState Key Laboratory of Proteomics, Beijing Proteome Research Center, National Center for Protein Sciences(Beijing), Beijing Institute of Lifeomics, Beijing 102206, China.
Yi WangState Key Laboratory of Proteomics, Beijing Proteome Research Center, National Center for Protein Sciences(Beijing), Beijing Institute of Lifeomics, Beijing 102206, China.
Congying WuInstitute of Systems Biomedicine, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China.
Fuchu HeSchool of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China; State Key Laboratory of Proteomics, Beijing Proteome Research Center, National Center for Protein Sciences(Beijing), Beijing Institute of Lifeomics, Beijing 102206, China. Electronic address: hefc@nic.bmi.ac.cn.
Jun QinState Key Laboratory of Proteomics, Beijing Proteome Research Center, National Center for Protein Sciences(Beijing), Beijing Institute of Lifeomics, Beijing 102206, China. Electronic address: jqin1965@126.com.
Tingting LiDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China; Institute of Systems Biomedicine, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China. Electronic address: litt@hsc.pku.edu.cn.
Beijing Proteome Research Center · CNPeking University · CNTsinghua University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMolecular subtyping of cancer aimed to predict patient overall survival (OS) and nominate drug targets for patient treatments is central to precision oncology. Owing to the rapid development of phosphoproteomics, we can now measure thousands of phosphoproteins in human cancer tissues. However, limited studies report how to analyse the complex phosphoproteomic data for cancer subtyping and to nominate druggable kinase candidates.

findingsIn this work, we reanalysed the phosphoproteomic data of high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) from the Clinical Proteomic Tumour Analysis Consortium (CPTAC). Our analysis classified HGSOC into 5 major subtypes that were associated with different OS and appeared to be more accurate than that achieved with protein profiling. We provided a workflow to identify 29 kinases whose increased activities in tumours are associated with poor survival. The altered kinase signalling landscape of HGSOC included the PI3K/AKT/mTOR, cell cycle and MAP kinase signalling pathways. We also developed a "patient-specific" hierarchy of clinically actionable kinases and selected kinase inhibitors by considering kinase activation and kinase inhibitor selectivity.

interpretationOur study offered a global phosphoproteomics data analysis workflow to aid in cancer molecular subtyping, determining phosphorylation-based cancer hallmarks and facilitating nomination of kinase inhibition in cancer.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorProteomicsAlgorithmsComputational BiologyDatabases, GeneticEnzyme ActivationFemaleHumansLigandsModels, BiologicalMolecular Targeted TherapyOvarian NeoplasmsPhosphoproteinsPrognosisProtein BindingProtein Kinase InhibitorsBiomarkers, TumorLigandsPhosphoproteinsProtein Kinase InhibitorsProtein KinasesDruggable kinaseOvarian cancerPhosphoproteomics

Identifiers

PMID30594550
PMCPMC6412074
OpenAlexW2906052106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.