Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30594306›Full record

ReviewTrends in pharmacological sciences2019

Toxicogenomics: A 2020 Vision.

Zhichao Liu, Ruili Huang, Ruth Roberts, Weida Tong

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in pharmacological sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. AIVIVE: a novel AI framework for enhanced in vitro to in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE) of toxicogenomics data.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence in Toxicological Sciences.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zhichao LiuNational Center for Toxicological Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Jefferson, Arkansas 72079, USA. Electronic address: zhichao.liu@fda.hhs.gov.
Ruili HuangNational Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland 20850, USA.
Ruth RobertsApconiX, BioHub at Alderley Park, Alderley Edge, SK10 4TG, UK; University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Weida TongNational Center for Toxicological Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Jefferson, Arkansas 72079, USA. Electronic address: weida.tong@fda.hhs.gov.

Funding

Toxicology in the 21st Century Program (Tox21) - Computational ToxicologyZIATR000040 · NCATS · NATIONAL CENTER FOR ADVANCING TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCES · PI HUANG, RUILI · 2016 to 2025
$3.5M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 TR999999Intramural NIH HHS ZIA TR000040
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Toxicogenomics (TGx) has contributed significantly to toxicology and now has great potential to support moves towards animal-free approaches in regulatory decision making. Here, we discuss in vitro TGx systems and their potential impact on risk assessment. We raise awareness of the rapid advancement of genomics technologies, which generates novel genomics features essential for enhanced risk assessment. We specifically emphasize the importance of reproducibility in utilizing TGx in the regulatory setting. We also highlight the role of machine learning (particularly deep learning) in developing TGx-based predictive models. Lastly, we touch on the topics of how TGx approaches could facilitate adverse outcome pathways (AOP) development and enhance read-across strategies to further regulatory application. Finally, we summarize current efforts to develop TGx for risk assessment and set out remaining challenges.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimal Testing AlternativesHumansMachine LearningReproducibility of ResultsRisk AssessmentToxicogeneticsadverse outcome pathwaysdeep learningregulatory sciencesreproducibilitytoxicogenomics

Identifiers

PMID30594306
PMCPMC9988209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.