Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30594250›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2018

Development of multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) framework for off-patent pharmaceuticals - an application on improving tender decision making in Indonesia.

Andras Inotai, Diana Brixner, Nikos Maniadakis, Iwan Dwiprahasto, Erna Kristin, Agus Prabowo, Alfi Yasmina, Sigit Priohutomo, Bertalan Németh, Kalman Wijaya and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. How to select a best-value biological medicine? A practical model to support hospital pharmacists.American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Andras InotaiSyreon Research Institute, Mexikói str. 65/A, Budapest, 1142, Hungary. andras.inotai@syreon.eu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0663-2733
Diana BrixnerDepartment of Pharmacotherapy, University of Utah College Of Pharmacy, Pharmacotherapy Outcomes Research Center, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Nikos ManiadakisHealth Services Organization and Management, National School of Public Health, Athens, Greece.
Iwan DwiprahastoDepartment Of Pharmacology & Therapy, Faculty Of Medicine, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Erna KristinDepartment Of Pharmacology & Therapy, Faculty Of Medicine, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Agus PrabowoNational Public Procurement Agency of the Republic of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Alfi YasminaDepartment Of Pharmacology, Faculty Of Medicine, Lambung Mangkurat University, Banjarmasin, Indonesia.
Sigit PriohutomoCoordinating Ministry for Human Development and Culture Building, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Bertalan NémethSyreon Research Institute, Mexikói str. 65/A, Budapest, 1142, Hungary.
Kalman WijayaAbbott Established Pharmaceutical Division, Basel, Switzerland.
Zoltan KaloSyreon Research Institute, Mexikói str. 65/A, Budapest, 1142, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOff-patent pharmaceuticals (OPPs) hold vital importance in meeting public health objectives, especially in developing countries where resources are limited. OPPs are comprised of off-patent originals, branded generics and unbranded generics; nonetheless, these products are not identical and often there are differences in their equivalence, manufacturing quality standards and reliability of supply. This necessitates reconsideration of the lowest price policy objective in pharmaceutical decision making. The aim of this study was to develop a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) framework through a pilot workshop to inform the national procurement of OPPs in Indonesia.

methodsAn initial list of potentially relevant criteria was identified based on previous work and a literature review. In a 2-day pilot policy workshop, twenty local experts representing different stakeholder groups and decision-making bodies selected the final criteria, approved the scoring function for each criterion, and assigned weights to each criterion.

resultsAn MCDA framework was proposed for OPP drug decision making in developing countries, which included price and 8 non-price criteria. Based on the pilot policy workshop 6 + 1 criteria were considered relevant for Indonesia: pharmaceutical price (40% weight), manufacturing quality (18.8%), equivalence with the reference product (12.2%), product stability and drug formulation (12.2%), reliability of drug supply (8.4%), real world clinical or economic outcomes, such as adherence or non-drug costs (4.2%) and pharmacovigilance (3.6%).

conclusionsAccording to the pilot policy workshop, other criteria apart from price need to be strengthened in the tendering process. The introduction of additional criteria for OPP procurement in an MCDA framework creates incentives for manufacturers to invest into improved manufacturing standards, equivalence proof, product quality, reliability of supply or even additional real-world data collection, which ultimately may result in more health gain for the society.

Indexed as

Decision Support TechniquesCommerceDrug ApprovalDrug CostsDrug IndustryDrugs, GenericHumansIndonesiaPatents as TopicPilot ProjectsProgram DevelopmentQuality ControlReproducibility of ResultsDrugs, GenericBioequivalenceDeveloping countriesMulti-criteria decision analysisOff-patent pharmaceuticalsTender

Identifiers

PMID30594250
PMCPMC6310978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.