Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30594236›Full record

ArticleTrials2018

Knowledge translation in child welfare-improving educational outcomes for children at risk: study protocol for a hybrid randomized controlled pragmatic trial.

Thomas Engell, Ingvild Barbara Follestad, Anne Andersen, Kristine Amlund Hagen

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Thomas EngellThe Regional Centre for Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Eastern and Southern Norway, PO Box 4623, 0405, Oslo, Norway. te@r-bup.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9515-9732
Ingvild Barbara FollestadThe Regional Centre for Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Eastern and Southern Norway, PO Box 4623, 0405, Oslo, Norway.
Anne AndersenThe Regional Centre for Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Eastern and Southern Norway, PO Box 4623, 0405, Oslo, Norway.
Kristine Amlund HagenThe Norwegian Center for Child Behavioral Development (NCCBD), a University of Oslo affiliate, Postboks 7053 Majorstuen, 0306, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

Norges Forskningsråd 256496
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Norway, a disproportionately high number of children receiving Child Welfare Services (CWS) struggle academically and drop out of school. Academic attainment is one of the strongest protective factors against societal marginalization. The present study is part of a knowledge translation project in collaboration with local CWS with the aim to develop, implement, and evaluate Enhanced Academic Support (EAS) for primary school children in CWS. METHODS/

designThe study is a mixed-methods hybrid type 2 randomized, controlled pragmatic trial. The participants are approximately 120 children whose families receive support measures from three child welfare agencies in and around Oslo, Norway, and practitioners from these agencies. Families are randomly assigned to either the EAS condition or "business as usual" support. Primary outcomes are math and reading skills, parental involvement in school, and intervention fidelity. Questionnaires and academic tests are administered at baseline, post-intervention (after 6 months), and at follow-up (after 12 months). Implementation drivers are assessed before and after the trial period, and intervention fidelity is monitored during the trial through checklists and structured telephone interviews. Semi-structured interviews and focus groups are conducted after the trial. DISCUSSION: This hybrid study has two implications. (1) The effects of providing EAS to children in child welfare will be investigated. The study also explores how each core component of the intervention and the use of specific adaptations, implementation drivers, and other important child-level covariates moderate the overall effects. The results can provide valuable knowledge about how to deliver precise and effective academic support to increase academic skills and prevent dropout. In turn, this can promote academic completion and well-being, outcomes that are beneficial for both children and society at large. (2) The study also evaluates the feasibility of applying an Integrated Knowledge Translation model designed to develop, implement, and evaluate research-supported practice in health, care, and welfare services in less time than is usually the case. If deemed successful, this model will provide an efficient collaborative approach to translate the best available evidence into effective evidence-based practice, applicable in effectiveness research and quality improvement efforts.

trial registrationISRCTN, ISRCTN38968073 . Registered on 18 September 2017. https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN38968073 .

Indexed as

Child BehaviorChild DevelopmentChild Health ServicesChild WelfareEducational StatusAge FactorsChildEducational MeasurementFamily RelationsFemaleHumansMaleNorwayParentingPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicRisk AssessmentAcademic supportChild welfareCommon elementsCore componentsEducationEffectiveness studyHybrid studyImplementationKnowledge translationPrimary school children

Identifiers

PMID30594236
PMCPMC6311076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.