Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30594169›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2018

Does endometrial scratching increase the rate of spontaneous conception in couples with unexplained infertility and a good prognosis (Hunault > 30%)? Study protocol of the SCRaTCH-OFO trial: a randomized controlled trial.

B N Bui, H L Torrance, C Janssen, B Cohlen, J P de Bruin, J E den Hartog, P J Q van der Linden, K L Deurloo, J W M Maas, R van Oppenraaij and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Dysregulated miR-124-3p in endometrial epithelial cells reduces endometrial receptivity by altering polarity and adhesion.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Meta-analysis of the embryo freezing transfer interval.Reproductive medicine and biology · 2021
    Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 17 institutions in 1 country.

B N BuiUniversity Medical Centre Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584, CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands. b.n.bui@umcutrecht.nl.
H L TorranceUniversity Medical Centre Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584, CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
C JanssenGroene Hart Hospital, Gouda, The Netherlands.
B CohlenIsala Fertility Clinic, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
J P de BruinJeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.
J E den HartogMaastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
P J Q van der LindenDeventer Hospital, Deventer, The Netherlands.
K L DeurlooDiakonessenhuis, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
J W M MaasMáxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, The Netherlands.
R van OppenraaijMaasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
A CantineauUniversity Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
C B LambalkVrije Universiteit Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
H VisserTergooi Hospital, Hilversum, The Netherlands.
E BrinkhuisMeander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.
J van DisseldorpSt. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
B C SchootCatharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
C LardenoijeLaurentius Hospital, Roermond, The Netherlands.
M van WelyDutch Consortium for Healthcare Evaluation and Research in Obstetrics and Gynecology - NVOG Consortium 2.0, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
M J C EijkemansUniversity Medical Centre Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584, CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
F J M BroekmansUniversity Medical Centre Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584, CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
University Medical Center Utrecht · NLDeventer Ziekenhuis · NLDiakonessenhuis hospital · NLGroene Hart Ziekenhuis · NLIsala · NLJeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis · NLLaurentius Ziekenhuis · NLMaasstad Ziekenhuis · NLMaastricht University Medical Centre · NLMáxima Medisch Centrum · NLMeander Medisch Centrum · NLNederlandse Vereniging voor Obstetrie en Gynaecologie · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLSt. Antonius Ziekenhuis · NLTergooi · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NL

Funding

ZonMw 843001808
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the Netherlands, couples with unexplained infertility and a good prognosis to conceive spontaneously (i.e. Hunault > 30%) are advised to perform timed intercourse for at least another 6 months. If couples fail to conceive within this period, they will usually start assisted reproductive technology (ART). However, treatment of unexplained infertility by ART is empirical and can involve significant burdens. Intentional endometrial injury, also called 'endometrial scratching', has been proposed to positively affect the chance of embryo implantation in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF). It might also be beneficial for couples with unexplained infertility as defective endometrial receptivity may play a role in these women. The primary aim of this study is to determine whether endometrial scratching increases live birth rates in women with unexplained infertility.

methodA multicentre randomized controlled trial will be conducted in Dutch academic and non-academic hospitals starting from November 2017. A total of 792 women with unexplained infertility and a good prognosis for spontaneous conception < 12 months (Hunault > 30%) will be included, of whom half will undergo endometrial scratching in the luteal phase of the natural cycle. The women in the control group will not undergo endometrial scratching. According to Dutch guidelines, both groups will subsequently perform timed intercourse for at least 6 months. The primary endpoint is cumulative live birth rate. Secondary endpoints are clinical and ongoing pregnancy rate; miscarriage rate; biochemical pregnancy loss; multiple pregnancy rate; time to pregnancy; progression to intrauterine insemination (IUI) or IVF; pregnancy complications; complications of endometrial scratching; costs and endometrial tissue parameters associated with reproductive success or failure. The follow-up duration is 12 months. DISCUSSION: Several small studies show a possible beneficial effect of endometrial scratching in women with unexplained infertility trying to conceive naturally or through IUI. However, the quality of this evidence is very low, making it unclear whether these women will truly benefit from this procedure. The SCRaTCH-OFO trial aims to investigate the effect of endometrial scratching on live birth rate in women with unexplained infertility and a good prognosis for spontaneous conception < 12 months.

trial registrationNTR6687 , registered August 31st, 2017. PROTOCOL VERSION: Version 2.6, November 14th, 2018.

Indexed as

Birth RateReproductive Techniques, AssistedAbortion, SpontaneousAdolescentAdultEndometriumFemaleHumansInfertility, FemaleLive BirthLuteal PhaseMulticenter Studies as TopicNetherlandsPrognosisRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicYoung AdultEndometrial injuryEndometrial receptivityEndometrial scratchEndometrial scratchingExpectant managementHunault > 30%Implantation failureUnexplained infertility

Identifiers

PMID30594169
PMCPMC6311044
OpenAlexW2907395817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.