Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30594166›Full record

ArticleBMC biotechnology2018

A chicken bioreactor for efficient production of functional cytokines.

Lissa R Herron, Clare Pridans, Matthew L Turnbull, Nikki Smith, Simon Lillico, Adrian Sherman, Hazel J Gilhooley, Martin Wear, Dominic Kurian, Grigorios Papadakos and 4 more

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biotechnology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Fourth Report on Chicken Genes and Chromosomes 2022.Cytogenetic and genome research · 2022
    Review
  14. Effect of DietaryAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Lissa R HerronThe Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian, EH25 9RG, UK. Lissa.Herron@roslintech.com.ORCID 0000-0001-9961-4421
Clare PridansThe Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian, EH25 9RG, UK.
Matthew L TurnbullThe Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian, EH25 9RG, UK.
Nikki SmithThe Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian, EH25 9RG, UK.
Simon LillicoThe Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian, EH25 9RG, UK.
Adrian ShermanThe Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian, EH25 9RG, UK.
Hazel J GilhooleyThe Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian, EH25 9RG, UK.
Martin WearEdinburgh Protein Production Facility, Wellcome Trust Centre for Cell Biology (WTCCB), University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH9 3JR, UK.
Dominic KurianThe Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian, EH25 9RG, UK.
Grigorios PapadakosRoslin Technologies Limited, Roslin Innovation Centre, Easter Bush Campus, Midlothian, EH25 9RG, UK.
Paul DigardThe Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian, EH25 9RG, UK.
David A HumeThe Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian, EH25 9RG, UK.
Andrew C GillThe Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian, EH25 9RG, UK.
Helen M SangThe Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian, EH25 9RG, UK. Helen.Sang@roslin.ed.ac.uk.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/I013113/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J01446X/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M021920/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/D/20221658Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/D/20320000Medical Research Council MC_PC_16043Medical Research Council MR/K000276/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 081287/Z/06/ZWellcome Trust 101527/Z/13/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe global market for protein drugs has the highest compound annual growth rate of any pharmaceutical class but their availability, especially outside of the US market, is compromised by the high cost of manufacture and validation compared to traditional chemical drugs. Improvements in transgenic technologies allow valuable proteins to be produced by genetically-modified animals; several therapeutic proteins from such animal bioreactors are already on the market after successful clinical trials and regulatory approval. Chickens have lagged behind mammals in bioreactor development, despite a number of potential advantages, due to the historic difficulty in producing transgenic birds, but the production of therapeutic proteins in egg white of transgenic chickens would substantially lower costs across the entire production cycle compared to traditional cell culture-based production systems. This could lead to more affordable treatments and wider markets, including in developing countries and for animal health applications.

resultsHere we report the efficient generation of new transgenic chicken lines to optimize protein production in eggs. As proof-of-concept, we describe the expression, purification and functional characterization of three pharmaceutical proteins, the human cytokine interferon α2a and two species-specific Fc fusions of the cytokine CSF1.

conclusionOur work optimizes and validates a transgenic chicken system for the cost-effective production of pure, high quality, biologically active protein for therapeutics and other applications.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedBioreactorsBiotechnologyChickensCytokinesHumansInterferon-alphaMacrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorRecombinant ProteinsCSF1 protein, humanCytokinesIFNA2 protein, humanInterferon-alphaMacrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorRecombinant ProteinsAnimal biotechnologyBiologicsCytokinesRecombinant proteinsTransgenic animals

Identifiers

PMID30594166
PMCPMC6311007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.