ArticleBMC nephrology2018
Gene mutation analysis in 12 Chinese children with congenital nephrotic syndrome.
Article in BMC nephrology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genetic insights into congenital and infantile nephrotic syndrome: predicting severity and informing care.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2026Review
- Primary Coenzyme Q10 Deficiency: An Update.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- A Cohort Study on Deficiency of ADA2 from China.Journal of clinical immunology · 2023Article
- Predicting and Understanding the Pathology of Single Nucleotide Variants in HumanAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- A Family Segregating Lethal Primary Coenzyme Q10 Deficiency Due to Two NovelFrontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Genetic Variations and Clinical Features ofFrontiers in medicine · 2021Article
- Genetic aspects of congenital nephrotic syndrome: a consensus statement from the ERKNet-ESPN inherited glomerulopathy working group.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2020Article
- Genetic heterogeneity of pediatric systemic lupus erythematosus with lymphoproliferation.Medicine · 2020Article
- Expanding the spectrum of A20 haploinsufficiency in two Chinese families: cases report.BMC medical genetics · 2019Article
- Analysis of 14 Patients With Congenital Nephrotic Syndrome.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCongenital nephrotic syndrome (CNS) is characterised by increased proteinuria, hypoproteinemia, and edema beginning in the first 3 months of life. Recently, molecular genetic studies have identified several genes involved in the pathogenesis of CNS. A systematic investigation of the genes for CNS in China has never been performed; therefore, we conducted a mutational analysis in 12 children with CNS,with the children coming from 10 provinces and autonomous regions in China.
methodsTwelve children with CNS were enrolled from 2009 to 2016. A mutational analysis was performed in six children by Sanger sequencing in eight genes (NPHS1, NPHS2, PLCE1, WT1, LAMB2, LMXIB, COQ6 and COQ2) before 2014, and whole-exome sequencing was used from 2014 to 2016 in another six children. Significant variants that were detected by next generation sequencing were confirmed by conventional Sanger sequencing in the patients' families.
resultsOf the 12 children, eight patients had a compound heterozygous NPHS1 mutation, one patient had a de novo mutation in the WT1 gene, and another patient with extrarenal symptoms had a homozygous mutation in the COQ6 gene. No mutations were detected in genes NPHS2, PLCE1, LAMB2, LMXIB, and COQ2 in the 12 patients.
conclusionsThis study demonstrates that the majority of CNS cases (67%, 8/12 patients) are caused by genetic defects, and the NPHS1 mutation is the most common cause of CNS in Chinese patients. A mutational analysis of NPHS1 should be recommended in Chinese patients with CNS in all exons of NPHS1 and in the intron-exon boundaries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.