ArticleBMC bioinformatics2018
Time-lagged Ordered Lasso for network inference.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Longitudinal symptom dynamics in postoperative patients with liver cancer: A cross-lagged panel network analysis.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2026Article
- Reconstructing Dynamic Gene Regulatory Networks Using f-Divergence from Time-Series scRNA-Seq Data.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Article
- Nitrogen sensing and regulatory networks: it's about time and space.The Plant cell · 2024Review
- Using single cell atlas data to reconstruct regulatory networks.Nucleic acids research · 2023Article
- Network inference with Granger causality ensembles on single-cell transcriptomics.Cell reports · 2022Article
- Gene regulatory network inference in long-livediScience · 2022Article
- Inferring causal gene regulatory networkFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
- Integrative Modelling of Gene Expression and Digital Phenotypes to Describe Senescence in Wheat.Genes · 2021Article
- Machine learning in postgenomic biology and personalized medicine.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Data mining and knowledge discoveryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAccurate gene regulatory networks can be used to explain the emergence of different phenotypes, disease mechanisms, and other biological functions. Many methods have been proposed to infer networks from gene expression data but have been hampered by problems such as low sample size, inaccurate constraints, and incomplete characterizations of regulatory dynamics. Since expression regulation is dynamic, time-course data can be used to infer causality, but these datasets tend to be short or sparsely sampled. In addition, temporal methods typically assume that the expression of a gene at a time point depends on the expression of other genes at only the immediately preceding time point, while other methods include additional time points without any constraints to account for their temporal distance. These limitations can contribute to inaccurate networks with many missing and anomalous links.
resultsWe adapted the time-lagged Ordered Lasso, a regularized regression method with temporal monotonicity constraints, for de novo reconstruction. We also developed a semi-supervised method that embeds prior network information into the Ordered Lasso to discover novel regulatory dependencies in existing pathways. R code is available at https://github.com/pn51/laggedOrderedLassoNetwork .
conclusionsWe evaluated these approaches on simulated data for a repressilator, time-course data from past DREAM challenges, and a HeLa cell cycle dataset to show that they can produce accurate networks subject to the dynamics and assumptions of the time-lagged Ordered Lasso regression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.