Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30593587›Full record

ArticleEye (London, England)2019

A prospective study of the incidence, associations and outcomes of ocular surface squamous neoplasia in the United Kingdom.

Christine A Kiire, Rosalind M K Stewart, Sathish Srinivasan, Heinrich Heimann, Stephen B Kaye, Baljean Dhillon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Eye (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Optical coherence tomography angiography in evaluating the response of ocular surface squamous neoplasia to topical immunotherapy.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christine A KiireOxford Eye Hospital, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK. christine.kiire@ouh.nhs.uk.
Rosalind M K StewartSt Paul's Eye Unit, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Sathish SrinivasanDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Ayr, Ayr, UK.
Heinrich HeimannSt Paul's Eye Unit, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Stephen B KayeSt Paul's Eye Unit, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Baljean DhillonSchool of Clinical Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5993-0278

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo describe the incidence, associations and outcomes of ocular surface squamous neoplasia (OSSN) in the United Kingdom.

methodsProspective, observational study of every new case of OSSN reported via the British Ophthalmological Surveillance Unit reporting scheme over a 12-month period. Cases were followed up for 12 months.

resultsThe reported incidence of OSSN was 0.53 cases/million/year (conjunctival intraepithelial neoplasia: 0.43 cases/million/year; squamous cell carcinoma: 0.08 cases/million/year). Eighty-five per cent of affected patients were male, 97% were Caucasian, and the mean age at presentation was 67.9 (±12.8) years. Information on potential underlying risk factors was frequently unknown. The most commonly affected sites were the limbus and the nasal and temporal bulbar conjunctivae. Most patients presented with a visual acuity of 6/9 or better, without symptoms of pain or visual loss. Excision (with or without additional treatment) was the most common first-line treatment and interferon (with or without additional treatment) was the most common second-line treatment, although management varied widely. Complications of treatment were rare but occasionally severe. Recurrence within 12 months of follow-up occurred in at least 6% of patients.

conclusionAlthough subject to reporting bias, these data suggest that there has not been a significant change in the incidence of OSSN in the United Kingdom, or its demographic profile, since 1996. The broad range of management approaches identified in this study reflect a lack of consensus as to the optimal referral and treatment pathways.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibiotics, AntineoplasticCarcinoma in SituCarcinoma, Squamous CellConjunctival NeoplasmsCryotherapyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlucocorticoidsHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedOphthalmologic Surgical ProceduresAntibiotics, AntineoplasticGlucocorticoids

Identifiers

PMID30593587
PMCPMC6367470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.