Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30593289›Full record

ReviewMolecular brain2018

What does LTP tell us about the roles of CaMKII and PKMζ in memory?

Todd Charlton Sacktor, André Antonio Fenton

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular brain, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. PKMζ-KIBRA interactions, molecular turnover, and memory.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Todd Charlton SacktorDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, The Robert F. Furchgott Center for Neural and Behavioral Science, State University of New York Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, 11203, USA. tsacktor@downstate.edu.
André Antonio FentonDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, The Robert F. Furchgott Center for Neural and Behavioral Science, State University of New York Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, 11203, USA. afenton@nyu.edu.
State University of New York · US

Funding

Molecular mechanisms of memory maintenance and dysfunction in neural circuitsR01MH115304 · NIMH · SUNY DOWNSTATE MEDICAL CENTER · PI FENTON, ANDRE ANTONIO, SACKTOR, TODD C · 2018 to 2022
$4.1M
Regulation and Neural Function of Atypical PKCR37MH057068 · NIMH · SUNY DOWNSTATE MEDICAL CENTER · PI SACKTOR, TODD C · 2011 to 2020
$4.0M
Neural coordination and discoordination in Fmr1 null miceR01NS105472 · NINDS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI FENTON, ANDRE ANTONIO · 2017 to 2021
$1.8M
Hippocampal neurogenesis, pattern separation & age-related cognitive impairments.R01AG043688 · NIA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI FENTON, ANDRE ANTONIO, HEN, RENE · 2013 to 2017
$1.6M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG043688NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH115304NIMH NIH HHS R37 MH057068NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS105472
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In "Criteria for identifying the molecular basis of the engram (CaMKII, PKMζ)," Lisman proposes that elucidating the mechanism of LTP maintenance is key to understanding memory storage. He suggests three criteria for a maintenance mechanism to evaluate data on CaMKII and PKMζ as memory storage molecules: necessity, occlusion, and erasure. Here we show that when the criteria are tested, the results reveal important differences between the molecules. Inhibiting PKMζ reverses established, protein synthesis-dependent late-LTP, without affecting early-LTP or baseline synaptic transmission. In contrast, blocking CaMKII has two effects: 1) inhibiting CaMKII activity blocks LTP induction but not maintenance, and 2) disrupting CaMKII interactions with NMDARs in the postsynaptic density (PSD) depresses both early-LTP and basal synaptic transmission equivalently. To identify a maintenance mechanism, we propose a fourth criterion - persistence. PKMζ increases for hours during LTP maintenance in hippocampal slices, and for over a month in specific brain regions during long-term memory storage in conditioned animals. In contrast, increased CaMKII activity lasts only minutes following LTP induction, and CaMKII translocation to the PSD in late-LTP or memory has not been reported. Lastly, do the PKMζ and CaMKII models integrate the many other signaling molecules important for LTP? Activity-dependent PKMζ synthesis is regulated by many of the signaling molecules that induce LTP, including CaMKII, providing a plausible mechanism for new gene expression in the persistent phosphorylation by PKMζ maintaining late-LTP and memory. In contrast, CaMKII autophosphorylation and translocation do not appear to require new protein synthesis. Therefore, the cumulative evidence supports a core role for PKMζ in late-LTP and long-term memory maintenance, and separate roles for CaMKII in LTP induction and for the maintenance of postsynaptic structure and synaptic transmission in a mechanism distinct from late-LTP.

Indexed as

AnimalsCalcium-Calmodulin-Dependent Protein Kinase Type 2HumansLong-Term PotentiationMemoryMutationProtein Kinase CProtein Kinase C zetaSynaptic TransmissionCalcium-Calmodulin-Dependent Protein Kinase Type 2Protein Kinase CProtein Kinase C zeta

Identifiers

PMID30593289
PMCPMC6309091
OpenAlexW2907197696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.