Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30593274›Full record

ArticleMicrobial cell factories2018

Functional analysis of the role of CcpA in Lactobacillus plantarum grown on fructooligosaccharides or glucose: a transcriptomic perspective.

Yanqing Lu, Sichao Song, Huaixiang Tian, Haiyan Yu, Jianxin Zhao, Chen Chen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial cell factories, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The Role ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Genetic Elements OrchestratingInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  13. Recent progress on n-butanol production by lactic acid bacteria.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Comparative Transcriptional Analysis ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yanqing LuSchool of Perfume and Aroma Technology, Shanghai Institute of Technology, Shanghai, 201418, People's Republic of China.
Sichao SongShanghai-MOST Key Laboratory of Health and Disease Genomics, Chinese National Human Genome Center at Shanghai, Shanghai, 201203, People's Republic of China.
Huaixiang TianSchool of Perfume and Aroma Technology, Shanghai Institute of Technology, Shanghai, 201418, People's Republic of China.
Haiyan YuSchool of Perfume and Aroma Technology, Shanghai Institute of Technology, Shanghai, 201418, People's Republic of China.
Jianxin ZhaoState Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology, School of Food Science and Technology, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, 214122, Jiangsu Province, People's Republic of China.
Chen ChenSchool of Perfume and Aroma Technology, Shanghai Institute of Technology, Shanghai, 201418, People's Republic of China. chenchen@sit.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4885-393X
Shanghai Institute of Technology · CNChinese National Human Genome Center · CNJiangnan University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 31471721National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 31501451Shanghai Rising-Star Program No. 17QB1404200"Shu Guang" project No. 16SG50
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe catabolite control protein A (CcpA) is a master regulator of many important cellular processes in Gram-positive bacteria. In Lactobacillus plantarum, CcpA directly or indirectly controls the transcription of a large number of genes that are involved in carbohydrate metabolism, aerobic and anaerobic growth, stress response and metabolite production, but its role in response to different carbon sources remains unclear.

resultsHere a combined transcriptomic and physiological approach was used to survey the global alterations that occurred during the logarithmic growth phase of wild-type and ccpA mutant strains of L. plantarum ST-III using fructooligosaccharides (FOS) or glucose as the sole carbon source. The inactivation of ccpA significantly affected the growth and production of metabolites under both carbon sources. About 15% of the total genes were significantly altered between wild-type and ccpA strains grown on glucose and the value is deceased to 12% when these two strains were compared on FOS, while only 7% were obviously changed due to the loss of CcpA when comparing strains grown on glucose and FOS. Although most of the differentially expressed genes mediated by CcpA are glucose dependent, FOS can also induce carbon catabolite repression (CCR) through the CcpA pathway. Moreover, the inactivation of ccpA led to a transformation from homolactic fermentation to mixed fermentation under aerobic conditions. CcpA can control genes directly by binding in the regulatory region of the target genes (mixed fermentation), indirectly through local regulators (fatty acid biosynthesis), or have a double effect via direct and indirect regulation (FOS metabolism).

conclusionOverall, our results show that CcpA plays a central role in response to carbon source and availability of L. plantarum and provide new insights into the complex and extended regulatory network of lactic acid bacteria.

Indexed as

Carbohydrate MetabolismCatabolite RepressionGlucoseLactiplantibacillus plantarumOligosaccharidesfructooligosaccharideGlucoseOligosaccharidesCarbohydrate metabolismCatabolite control protein AFatty acid biosynthesisLactobacillus plantarumMixed fermentationTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID30593274
PMCPMC6309078
OpenAlexW2906886192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.