Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30593266›Full record

ArticleBMC biology2018

Homology-independent multiallelic disruption via CRISPR/Cas9-based knock-in yields distinct functional outcomes in human cells.

Chenzi Zhang, Xiangjun He, Yvonne K Kwok, Feng Wang, Junyi Xue, Hui Zhao, Kin Wah Suen, Chi Chiu Wang, Jianwei Ren, George G Chen and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Targeted Gene Insertion: The Cutting Edge of CRISPR Drug Development with Hemophilia as a Highlight.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Evolving AAV-delivered therapeutics towards ultimate cures.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2021
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Gene Knock-Ins inGenetics · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Chenzi ZhangSchool of Biomedical Sciences, CUHK-GIBH CAS Joint Laboratory on Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region of China.
Xiangjun HeSchool of Biomedical Sciences, CUHK-GIBH CAS Joint Laboratory on Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region of China.
Yvonne K KwokDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region of China.
Feng WangSchool of Biomedical Sciences, CUHK-GIBH CAS Joint Laboratory on Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region of China.
Junyi XueSchool of Biomedical Sciences, CUHK-GIBH CAS Joint Laboratory on Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region of China.
Hui ZhaoSchool of Biomedical Sciences, CUHK-GIBH CAS Joint Laboratory on Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region of China.
Kin Wah SuenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region of China.
Chi Chiu WangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region of China.
Jianwei RenDepartment of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region of China.
George G ChenDepartment of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region of China.
Paul B S LaiDepartment of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region of China.
Jiangchao LiVascular Biology Research Institute, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510006, People's Republic of China.
Yin XiaSchool of Biomedical Sciences, CUHK-GIBH CAS Joint Laboratory on Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region of China.
Andrew M ChanSchool of Biomedical Sciences, CUHK-GIBH CAS Joint Laboratory on Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region of China.
Wai-Yee ChanSchool of Biomedical Sciences, CUHK-GIBH CAS Joint Laboratory on Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region of China. chanwy@cuhk.edu.hk.
Bo FengSchool of Biomedical Sciences, CUHK-GIBH CAS Joint Laboratory on Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region of China. fengbo@cuhk.edu.hk.ORCID 0000-0002-4018-3257
Chinese University of Hong Kong · HKGuangdong Pharmaceutical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCultured human cells are pivotal models to study human gene functions, but introducing complete loss of function in diploid or aneuploid cells has been a challenge. The recently developed CRISPR/Cas9-mediated homology-independent knock-in approach permits targeted insertion of large DNA at high efficiency, providing a tool for insertional disruption of a selected gene. Pioneer studies have showed promising results, but the current methodology is still suboptimal and functional outcomes have not been well examined. Taking advantage of the promoterless fluorescence reporter systems established in our previous study, here, we further investigated potentials of this new insertional gene disruption approach and examined its functional outcomes.

resultsExemplified by using hyperploid LO2 cells, we demonstrated that simultaneous knock-in of dual fluorescence reporters through CRISPR/Cas9-induced homology-independent DNA repair permitted one-step generation of cells carrying complete disruption of target genes at multiple alleles. Through knocking-in at coding exons, we generated stable single-cell clones carrying complete disruption of ULK1 gene at all four alleles, lacking intact FAT10 in all three alleles, or devoid of intact CtIP at both alleles. We have confirmed the depletion of ULK1 and FAT10 transcripts as well as corresponding proteins in the obtained cell clones. Moreover, consistent with previous reports, we observed impaired mitophagy in ULK1-/- cells and attenuated cytokine-induced cell death in FAT10-/- clones. However, our analysis showed that single-cell clones carrying complete disruption of CtIP gene at both alleles preserved in-frame aberrant CtIP transcripts and produced proteins. Strikingly, the CtIP-disrupted clones raised through another two distinct targeting strategies also produced varied but in-frame aberrant CtIP transcripts. Sequencing analysis suggested that diverse DNA processing and alternative RNA splicing were involved in generating these in-frame aberrant CtIP transcripts, and some infrequent events were biasedly enriched among the CtIP-disrupted cell clones.

conclusionMultiallelic gene disruption could be readily introduced through CRISPR/Cas9-induced homology-independent knock-in of dual fluorescence reporters followed by direct tracing and cell isolation. Robust cellular mechanisms exist to spare essential genes from loss-of-function modifications, by generating partially functional transcripts through diverse DNA and RNA processing mechanisms.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsDNA RepairAutophagy-Related Protein-1 HomologCarrier ProteinsCell LineEndodeoxyribonucleasesGene Knock-In TechniquesIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMutagenesis, InsertionalNuclear ProteinsUbiquitinsAutophagy-Related Protein-1 HomologCarrier ProteinsEndodeoxyribonucleasesIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsNuclear ProteinsRBBP8 protein, humanUBD protein, humanUbiquitinsULK1 protein, humanCtIPFAT10Homology-independent knock-inHyperploid cellsLoss-of-functionMultiallelic gene disruptionUlK1

Identifiers

PMID30593266
PMCPMC6310992
OpenAlexW2907433607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.