Observational studyMedicine2018
Association between indication for therapy by nutrition support team and nutritional status.
Observational study in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association between metformin use and the risk of developing open-angle glaucoma among patients with diabetes: a retrospective cohort study and meta-analysis.International ophthalmology · 2024 · on this mapPooled it
- Ultrasound Measurement of Dynamic Changes in Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter During Liposuction Surgery: A Prospective Clinical Trial.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Trial
- Evaluation of guideline adherence in enteral nutrition practices among ICU patients: a point prevalence study.BMJ open · 2026Observational
- Enhancing nutritional care in palliative care units: assessing nurse knowledge and quality perception in enteral nutrition practices.BMC nursing · 2024Article
- Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) outcomes in T1B esophageal cancer: a retrospective study.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Role of family medicine physicians in providing nutrition support to older patients admitted to orthopedics departments: a grounded theory approach.BMC primary care · 2024Article
- Impact of Visual Nutritional Indicator on the Nutritional Therapy in Intensive Care Unit.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2023Article
- Characteristics and clinical course of patients referred to the NST.Frontiers in nutrition · 2023Article
- Bridging Policy and Service Performance of Hospital-Based Nutrition Support by Healthcare Information Technology.Nutrients · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The nutrition support team is a multidisciplinary team composed of medical doctors, registered nurses, pharmacists, and nutritionists, who evaluate the nutritional status of patients. The objective of this study was to determine the relationship between indications for nutrition support team therapy and the nutritional status of patients hospitalized in local major hospitals.Patients who were referred to a nutrition support team from January to December 2016 were enrolled. Patients were classified into 4 age groups, and the weight categories were determined using body mass index (BMI). Four of 6 indications were used for referral to a nutrition support team. The required calories were estimated, and the nutritional status was classified into malnutrition or eutrophia, based on the estimation.The proportion of elderly patients (37.0%) was higher than that of younger ones (28.3%). Patients with higher BMI had a relatively lower proportion of malnutrition. Patients receiving enteral nutrition had greater risk of malnutrition (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 3.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.71-5.24). Patients receiving parenteral nutrition (aOR = 0.38, 95% CI = 0.30-0.47) and treated in the intensive care unit (aOR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.54-0.91) had lower risk of malnutrition. Patients with >3 indications for nutrition support team therapy had a lower risk of malnutrition than those with only 1 indication (aOR = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.37-0.77).Parenteral nutrition was the most common indication for referral to nutrition support team therapy; however, enteral nutrition had the poorest nutritional status. Patients receiving enteral nutrition who are referred to a nutrition support team need an intensive nutrition support strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.