Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30593213›Full record

Observational studyMedicine2018

Association between indication for therapy by nutrition support team and nutritional status.

Byung Chul Shin, In Ae Chun, So Yeon Ryu, Ji Eun Oh, Pahn Kyu Choi, Hyun Goo Kang

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Impact of Visual Nutritional Indicator on the Nutritional Therapy in Intensive Care Unit.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Byung Chul ShinDepartment of Nutritional Service Team.
In Ae ChunDepartment of Nutritional Service Team.
So Yeon RyuPreventive Medicine.
Ji Eun OhDepartment of Nutritional Service Team.
Pahn Kyu ChoiDepartment of Nutritional Service Team.
Hyun Goo KangDepartment of Neurology, Chonbuk National University School of Medicine, Jeonju, Republic of Korea.
Chosun University · KRChosun University Hospital · KRGeneral Department of Preventive Medicine · VNJeonbuk National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The nutrition support team is a multidisciplinary team composed of medical doctors, registered nurses, pharmacists, and nutritionists, who evaluate the nutritional status of patients. The objective of this study was to determine the relationship between indications for nutrition support team therapy and the nutritional status of patients hospitalized in local major hospitals.Patients who were referred to a nutrition support team from January to December 2016 were enrolled. Patients were classified into 4 age groups, and the weight categories were determined using body mass index (BMI). Four of 6 indications were used for referral to a nutrition support team. The required calories were estimated, and the nutritional status was classified into malnutrition or eutrophia, based on the estimation.The proportion of elderly patients (37.0%) was higher than that of younger ones (28.3%). Patients with higher BMI had a relatively lower proportion of malnutrition. Patients receiving enteral nutrition had greater risk of malnutrition (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 3.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.71-5.24). Patients receiving parenteral nutrition (aOR = 0.38, 95% CI = 0.30-0.47) and treated in the intensive care unit (aOR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.54-0.91) had lower risk of malnutrition. Patients with >3 indications for nutrition support team therapy had a lower risk of malnutrition than those with only 1 indication (aOR = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.37-0.77).Parenteral nutrition was the most common indication for referral to nutrition support team therapy; however, enteral nutrition had the poorest nutritional status. Patients receiving enteral nutrition who are referred to a nutrition support team need an intensive nutrition support strategy.

Indexed as

Nutritional StatusAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsBody Mass IndexEnergy IntakeEnteral NutritionFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMalnutritionMiddle AgedNutritional SupportParenteral Nutrition

Identifiers

PMID30593213
PMCPMC6314734
OpenAlexW2908228765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.