ArticleMedicine2018
Endoscopic submucosal dissection of papillary adenocarcinoma of stomach; protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Endoscopic and clinicopathological features of early gastric papillary adenocarcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Papillary Gastric Adenocarcinoma; Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
- Article
- Long noncoding RNA LINC00337 promote gastric cancer proliferation through repressing p21 mediated by EZH2.American journal of translational research · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEndoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a primary treatment for the early gastric cancer (EGC) who has a negligible risk of lymph node metastasis. Papillary adenocarcinoma (PAC) of stomach is a rare histologic variant of gastric cancer and categorized into EGC with differentiated-histology. However, aggressive features such as higher rate of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) or submucosal invasion have been reported, whereas comparable lymph node metastasis (LNM) rate to the lesions meeting the current ESD criteria also has been reported. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of ESD for EGC with PAC.
methodsWe will search the core databases (MEDLINE (through PubMed), the Cochrane Library, and Embase) from their inception to December 2018 by 2 independent evaluators. The P.I.C.O. is as follows; Patients: who have EGC with PAC, Intervention: ESD or surgery, Comparison: none, Outcome: at least one among the rate of complete resection, curative resection, en bloc resection, recurrence, procedure-related adverse event, LVI or LNM that enabled an evaluation of the feasibility of ESD. All types of study design with full text will be sought and included. The risk of bias will be assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. Descriptive data synthesis is planned, and quantitative synthesis will be used if the included studies are sufficiently homogenous. Publication bias will be assessed with quantitative analyses if more than 10 articles are enrolled.
resultsThe results will provide evidence for efficacy and safety of ESD for EGC with PAC.
conclusionThis study will provide evidence of ESD for EGC with PAC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.