ArticleMedicine2018
Practice styles, knowledge and attitudes of general practitioners and gastroenterology specialists who treat gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Article in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Analysis of attitudes and practices toward gastroesophageal reflux disease among the general population of Pakistan.Future science OA · 2024Article
- Article
- Enteric nervous system modulation of luminal pH modifies the microbial environment to promote intestinal health.PLoS pathogens · 2022Article
- Knowledge and practice of family medicine and internal medicine residents toward the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2021Article
- Awareness, experience, and practice of physicians regarding adult gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As little is known on the subject, our aim was to compare practice styles, knowledge and attitudes of general practitioners (GPs), and gastroenterology specialists (GIs) regarding the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).An internet survey designed by the authors was sent nationwide and randomly to 290 GIs and 1312 GPs. We assessed for the burden of GERD, indications for referral for a GI consultation, criteria for proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) selection, and main unmet treatment needs.Forty (14%) GIs and 132 (10%) GPs returned the questionnaire. Both groups treat 13 to 14 GERD patients weekly (mean age 41-50 years). The most common first and second line drug of choice in both groups was omeprazole and esomeprazole, respectively. GIs stated that the most important consideration for the selection of treatment was high safety profile, whereas GPs considered it to be a rapid symptomatic relief. In the case of first and second line PPI failures, GIs tended to prescribe a non PPI treatment, whereas GPs restarted esomeprazole. GIs stated that the most prevalent conceived limitations of PPI treatment were nighttime heartburn and undesirable side effects, whereas GPs considered treatment inflexibility and drug interactions.GIs and GPs hold different practice styles, knowledge, and attitudes on the treatment of GERD. Our findings ascertain the need for the development of updated National Clinical Guidelines focusing on GERD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.