Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30593061›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2018

Computational luminance constancy from naturalistic images.

Vijay Singh, Nicolas P Cottaris, Benjamin S Heasly, David H Brainard, Johannes Burge

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05004649 (The Effects of Stimulus Variability in Natural Visual Scenes), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05004649 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

The Effects of Stimulus Variability in Natural Visual Scenes

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PennsylvaniaRan2021 to 2022Enrolled19ConditionsVisual PerceptionArmsPsychophysical task
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Vijay SinghComputational Neuroscience Initiative, Department of Physics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Nicolas P CottarisDepartment of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Benjamin S HeaslyDepartment of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
David H BrainardDepartment of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Johannes BurgeNeuroscience Graduate Group, Bioengineering Graduate Group, Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Funding

Scientific TransparencyP30EY001583 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Qi N Cui · 1985 to 2026
$19.5M
COLOR CONSTANCY--REAL IMAGES AND EARLY VISUAL MECHANISMSR01EY010016 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BRAINARD, DAVID H. · 1998 to 2018
$5.4M
Estimation and Discrimination of Motion and Depth in Natural ScenesR01EY028571 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BURGE, JOHANNES D. · 2018 to 2022
$1.9M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY001583NEI NIH HHS R01 EY010016NEI NIH HHS R01 EY028571
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human visual system supports stable percepts of object color even though the light that reflects from object surfaces varies significantly with the scene illumination. To understand the computations that support stable color perception, we study how estimating a target object's luminous reflectance factor (LRF; a measure of the light reflected from the object under a standard illuminant) depends on variation in key properties of naturalistic scenes. Specifically, we study how variation in target object reflectance, illumination spectra, and the reflectance of background objects in a scene impact estimation of a target object's LRF. To do this, we applied supervised statistical learning methods to the simulated excitations of human cone photoreceptors, obtained from labeled naturalistic images. The naturalistic images were rendered with computer graphics. The illumination spectra of the light sources and the reflectance spectra of the surfaces in the scene were generated using statistical models of natural spectral variation. Optimally decoding target object LRF from the responses of a small learned set of task-specific linear receptive fields that operate on a contrast representation of the cone excitations yields estimates that are within 13% of the correct LRF. Our work provides a framework for evaluating how different sources of scene variability limit performance on luminance constancy.

Indexed as

LightLightingColor PerceptionFemaleHumansMaleModels, StatisticalPattern Recognition, VisualPhotic StimulationRetinal Cone Photoreceptor Cells

Identifiers

PMID30593061
PMCPMC6314111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.