ArticleJournal of vision2018
Computational luminance constancy from naturalistic images.
Article in Journal of vision, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05004649 (The Effects of Stimulus Variability in Natural Visual Scenes), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Effects of Stimulus Variability in Natural Visual Scenes
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- An image-computable spatio-chromatic receptive field model of the midget retinal ganglion cell mosaic across the retina.Journal of computational neuroscience · 2026Article
- Equivalent noise characterization of human lightness constancy.Journal of vision · 2022Article
- Article
- Lightness Discrimination Depends More on Bright Rather Than Shaded Regions of Three-Dimensional Objects.i-PerceptionArticle
- Characterization of human lightness discrimination thresholds for independent spectral variations.i-PerceptionArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The human visual system supports stable percepts of object color even though the light that reflects from object surfaces varies significantly with the scene illumination. To understand the computations that support stable color perception, we study how estimating a target object's luminous reflectance factor (LRF; a measure of the light reflected from the object under a standard illuminant) depends on variation in key properties of naturalistic scenes. Specifically, we study how variation in target object reflectance, illumination spectra, and the reflectance of background objects in a scene impact estimation of a target object's LRF. To do this, we applied supervised statistical learning methods to the simulated excitations of human cone photoreceptors, obtained from labeled naturalistic images. The naturalistic images were rendered with computer graphics. The illumination spectra of the light sources and the reflectance spectra of the surfaces in the scene were generated using statistical models of natural spectral variation. Optimally decoding target object LRF from the responses of a small learned set of task-specific linear receptive fields that operate on a contrast representation of the cone excitations yields estimates that are within 13% of the correct LRF. Our work provides a framework for evaluating how different sources of scene variability limit performance on luminance constancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.