Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30592275›Full record

ArticleMolecular medicine reports2019

Pain polymorphisms and opioids: An evidence based review.

Cláudia Margarida Pereira Vieira, Rosa Maria Fragoso, Deolinda Pereira, Rui Medeiros

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular medicine reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Journal of dental research · 2021
    Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Do Diabetes and Genetic Polymorphisms in theJournal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. CharacterizingPain reports
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cláudia Margarida Pereira VieiraMedical Oncology Department, Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto Francisco Gentil (IPO‑PORTO), 4200‑072 Porto, Portugal.
Rosa Maria FragosoMedical Oncology Department, Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto Francisco Gentil (IPO‑PORTO), 4200‑072 Porto, Portugal.
Deolinda PereiraMedical Oncology Department, Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto Francisco Gentil (IPO‑PORTO), 4200‑072 Porto, Portugal.
Rui MedeirosResearch Centre‑Molecular Oncology Group, Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto Francisco Gentil (IPO‑PORTO), 4200‑072 Porto, Portugal.
IPO Porto · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the various different candidate genetic polymorphisms of potential clinical relevance, there is not enough understanding of the inter‑individual variability in analgesic administration. The cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) genotype is thought to be one of the most studied. The aim of the present evidence‑based review was to determine if there is now sufficient evidence to make clinical recommendations based on a specific genomic profile. The data sources utilized were as follows: PubMed (NLM) database, Evidence Based Medicine Guidelines and Google. Research on clinical guidance standards, systematic reviews, meta‑analyses and clinical trials, published prior to January 2018, were evaluated in English, using the MeSH terms 'cancer pain', 'polymorphism', 'genetic' and 'gene polymorphism'. To assess the level of evidence, the Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy of the American Family Physician was applied. From the initial search, 12 systematic reviews and/or meta‑analyses, 5 clinical trials and 10 guidelines were selected. The results indicated that genetic variation of µ‑opioid receptor 1 (OPRM1) may contribute to inter‑individual differences in morphine consumption with recommendation grade A for OPRM A118G single nucleotide polymorphism (rs1799971). Polymorphisms associated with the metabolization process of morphine and other opioid drugs are very relevant in opioid titration and ethnic subgroup differences which have to be taken into account (particularly, for the recommendation grade A for the CYP2D6 polymorphism). In human studies, the catechol‑O‑methyl transferase (COMT) genotype affects the efficacy of opioids in acute and chronic pain under different settings, with recommendation grade B to the COMT single nucleotide polymorphism rs4680 (Val/Met). Finally, polymorphisms of the ATP‑binding cassette family of efflux transporters were highlighted. Consistent data on pain polymorphisms is now widely available; however, these results have had very little impact on clinical guidelines and daily oncologist practice. Persisting pain, side effects of grade 3 (NCI‑CTCAE v4.0) and breakthrough pain with more than 4 episodes/day should be considered the criteria for pain multidisciplinary team discussions and for polymorphism screening.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidCancer PainCatechol O-MethyltransferaseCytochrome P-450 CYP2D6GenotypeHumansMorphinePainPolymorphism, Single NucleotideReceptors, Opioid, muAnalgesics, OpioidCatechol O-MethyltransferaseCOMT protein, humanCytochrome P-450 CYP2D6MorphineOPRM1 protein, humanReceptors, Opioid, muanalgesicscancer paingenegeneticopioidpharmacogeneticspolymorphismsingle nucleotide polymorphism

Identifiers

PMID30592275
PMCPMC6390004
OpenAlexW2906535572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.