Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30592258›Full record

ArticleeLife2018

Two central pattern generators from the crab,

Jessica A Haley, David Hampton, Eve Marder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Energy-efficient network activity from disparate circuit parameters.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. From the Neuroscience of Individual Variability to Climate Change.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Effects ofJournal of neurophysiology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jessica A HaleyVolen Center and Biology Department, Brandeis University, Waltham, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6282-7124
David HamptonVolen Center and Biology Department, Brandeis University, Waltham, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8845-037X
Eve MarderVolen Center and Biology Department, Brandeis University, Waltham, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9632-5448

Funding

NEUROSCIENCE: FROM CHANNELS TO BEHAVIORT32MH019929 · NIMH · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI GRIFFITH, LESLIE C · 1994 to 2023
$8.5M
Neuromodulation and Robustness of Neurons and NetworksR35NS097343 · NINDS · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI MARDER, EVE E · 2017 to 2024
$7.8M
Quantitative Biology: a Graduate Curriculum Linking the Physical and Biomedical ST32EB009419 · NIBIB · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI GELLES, JEFF, KONDEV, JANE · 2009 to 2018
$2.8M
NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB009419NIH HHS R35 NS 097343NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH019929NINDS NIH HHS R35 NS097343
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The activity of neuronal circuits depends on the properties of the constituent neurons and their underlying synaptic and intrinsic currents. We describe the effects of extreme changes in extracellular pH - from pH 5.5 to 10.4 - on two central pattern generating networks, the stomatogastric and cardiac ganglia of the crab,

Indexed as

AnimalsBrachyuraCentral Pattern GeneratorsExtracellular SpaceHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationMaleNerve NetNeuronsPylorusCancer borealiscardiac ganglioncrustaceanneuroscienceocean acidificationpyloric rhythmstomatogastric ganglion

Identifiers

PMID30592258
PMCPMC6328273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.