Trial reportPhysiological reports2018
Recombinant human erythropoietin does not affect several microvascular parameters in well-trained cyclists.
Trial report in Physiological reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recombinant human erythropoietin does not affect several microvascular parameters in well-trained cyclists.Physiological reports · 2018Trial
- Detection of cutaneous oxygen saturation using a novel snapshot hyperspectral camera: a feasibility study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) has been used as a performance-enhancing agent by athletes in a variety of sports. The resulting increase in hematocrit levels leads to increased blood viscosity and can affect blood flow, potentially increasing the athlete's risk of developing health complications. However, the actual effects of using rHuEPO on microvascular blood flow and post-occlusive reactive hyperemia are currently unknown. We therefore evaluated the effect of rHuEPO on the cutaneous microcirculation in well-trained cyclists using laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI). This study was part of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel trial designed to investigate the effects of rHuEPO in 47 well-trained adult cyclists (age 18-50 years). Subjects received a weekly dose of either rHuEPO or placebo for 8 weeks, and LSCI was performed at baseline, after a maximal exercise test in week 6, and before maximal exercise in week 8. Endpoints included basal blood flux, maximum post-occlusion reperfusion, and time to return to baseline. Despite an increase in hematocrit levels in the rHuEPO-treated group, we found no statistically significant difference in microvascular function measured between the rHuEPO-treated group and the placebo group. Our results suggest that the increased hematocrit levels in rHuEPO-treated well-trained cyclists are not associated with changes in microvascular blood flow or post-occlusive reactive hyperemia measured using LSCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.