Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30592179›Full record

ArticleBrain and behavior2019

Neuroimaging markers of global cognition in early Alzheimer's disease: A magnetic resonance imaging-electroencephalography study.

Markus Waser, Thomas Benke, Peter Dal-Bianco, Heinrich Garn, Jochen A Mosbacher, Gerhard Ransmayr, Reinhold Schmidt, Stephan Seiler, Helge B D Sorensen, Poul J Jennum

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain and behavior, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Multimodal Wearable Biosensing Meets Multidomain AI: A Pathway to Decentralized Healthcare.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Unsuspected Involvement of Spinal Cord in Alzheimer Disease.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Markus WaserBiomedical Engineering, Department of Electrical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-8964-4675
Thomas BenkeDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Peter Dal-BiancoDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Heinrich GarnAIT Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH, Center for Digital Safety & Security, Sensing and Vision Solutions, Vienna, Austria.
Jochen A MosbacherDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Gerhard RansmayrClinic for Neurology II, Kepler University Hospital, Med Campus III, Linz, Austria.
Reinhold SchmidtDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Stephan SeilerDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Helge B D SorensenBiomedical Engineering, Department of Electrical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.
Poul J JennumDanish Center for Sleep Medicine, Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark.
Medical University of Graz · ATAustrian Institute of Technology · ATGlostrup Hospital · DKInnsbruck Medical University · ATKepler Universitätsklinikum · ATMedical University of Vienna · ATTechnical University of Denmark · DK

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF J 3766
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and electroencephalography (EEG) are a promising means to an objectified assessment of cognitive impairment in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Individually, however, these modalities tend to lack precision in both AD diagnosis and AD staging. A joint MRI-EEG approach that combines structural with functional information has the potential to overcome these limitations. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis cross-sectional study systematically investigated the link between MRI and EEG markers and the global cognitive status in early AD. We hypothesized that the joint modalities would identify cognitive deficits with higher accuracy than the individual modalities. In a cohort of 111 AD patients, we combined MRI measures of cortical thickness and regional brain volume with EEG measures of rhythmic activity, information processing and functional coupling in a generalized multiple regression model. Machine learning classification was used to evaluate the markers' utility in accurately separating the subjects according to their cognitive score.

resultsWe found that joint measures of temporal volume, cortical thickness, and EEG slowing were well associated with the cognitive status and explained 38.2% of ifs variation. The inclusion of the covariates age, sex, and education considerably improved the model. The joint markers separated the subjects with an accuracy of 84.7%, which was considerably higher than by using individual modalities.

conclusionsThese results suggest that including joint MRI-EEG markers may be beneficial in the diagnostic workup, thus allowing for adequate treatment. Further studies in larger populations, with a longitudinal design and validated against functional-metabolic imaging are warranted to confirm the results.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAlzheimer DiseaseBiomarkersCognitionCognitive DysfunctionCross-Sectional StudiesDiseaseElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeuroimagingBiomarkersAlzheimer diseasecognitionelectroencephalographymagnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID30592179
PMCPMC6346656
OpenAlexW2908390113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.