ArticleMaternal & child nutrition2018
"Someone's generosity has formed a bond between us": Interpersonal relationships in Internet-facilitated peer-to-peer milk sharing.
Article in Maternal & child nutrition, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Factors associated with informal human milk sharing among donors and recipients: A mixed-methods systematic review.PloS one · 2024Pooled it
- Views on wet nursing and expressing breastmilk for sharing and human milk bank donation among mothers in two parenting social media communities in Vietnam.Maternal & child nutrition · 2025Article
- The Ethics of Ancient Lactation and the Cult of the Perfect Breastfeeding Mother.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- An 'incredible community' or 'disgusting' and 'weird'? Representations of breastmilk sharing in worldwide news media.Maternal & child nutrition · 2021Article
- "Someone's generosity has formed a bond between us": Interpersonal relationships in Internet-facilitated peer-to-peer milk sharing.Maternal & child nutrition · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Internet-facilitated peer-to-peer milk sharing enables the giving and receiving of human milk between individuals previously unknown to one another. However, the process of milk sharing allows for milk sharing partners to develop relationships with one another. The development of relationships between 41 milk recipients and 97 milk donors in Internet-facilitated peer-to-peer milk sharing was explored via a questionnaire. Thirty-seven recipient respondents and 55 donor respondents placed some level of importance on developing a relationship with their milk sharing partner. Thirty-four recipient respondents and 48 donor respondents had developed a relationship with at least one milk sharing partner, from acquaintanceship to close friendship. Respondents also described milk kinship relationships. Friendships were commonly noted as a positive repercussion of milk sharing. Milk sharing stigma was the only commonly reported negative repercussion of milk sharing. Peer-to-peer milk recipients and donors are forced by circumstance and encouraged by the process of milk sharing and by their similarity to one another to trust each another, which acts as a catalyst to friendship development. Peer-to-peer milk sharing is a type of cooperative mothering wherein milk recipients are assisted in parenting their children via the gift of milk. However, reciprocity is evident as milk donors benefit from good feelings from helping another mother and child, pleasure through seeing the recipient infant grow, and often friendship with their milk recipient. Although Internet-facilitated peer-to-peer milk sharing is instigated by the impersonal medium of the Interweb, each milk sharing connection has the potential to become a real relationship.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.