Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30592165›Full record

ArticleMaternal & child nutrition2018

A pilot study on nutrients, antimicrobial proteins, and bacteria in commerce-free models for exchanging expressed human milk in the USA.

Maryanne T Perrin, April D Fogleman, Destiny D Davis, Courtney H Wimer, Kenneth G Vogel, Aunchalee E L Palmquist

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal & child nutrition, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maryanne T PerrinDepartment of Food, Bioprocessing and Nutrition Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1645-8310
April D FoglemanDepartment of Food, Bioprocessing and Nutrition Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8986-2250
Destiny D DavisDepartment of Food, Bioprocessing and Nutrition Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2947-2653
Courtney H WimerDepartment of Food, Bioprocessing and Nutrition Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3601-9518
Kenneth G VogelDepartment of Food, Bioprocessing and Nutrition Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6783-9199
Aunchalee E L PalmquistDepartment of Sociology and Anthropology, Elon University, Elon, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0848-6952

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Expressed human milk can be donated or sold through a variety of channels, including human milk banks, corporations or individuals, or peer-to-peer milk sharing. There is a paucity of research regarding the nutrient and bioactive profiles of expressed human milk exchanged through commerce-free scenarios, including peer-to-peer milk sharing. The study objective was to evaluate the macronutrient, antimicrobial protein, and bacteria composition in expressed human milk acquired via commerce-free arrangements. Expressed human milk samples were collected from the following commerce-free scenarios: milk expressed for a mother's or parent's own infant (MOM; N = 30); unpasteurized milk donated to a non-profit milk bank (BANKED; N = 30); milk expressed for peer-to-peer milk sharing (SHARED; N = 31); and health professional-facilitated milk sharing where donors are serologically screened and milk is dispensed raw (SCREENED; N = 30). Analyses were conducted for total protein, lactose, percent fat and water, lysozyme activity, immunoglobulin A (IgA) activity, total aerobic bacteria, coliform, and Staphylococcus aureus. No bacterial growth was observed in 52/121 samples, and 15/121 had growth greater than 5.0 log colony-forming units/mL. There was no evidence of differences by groups (p > .05) in lactose, fat, water, lysozyme activity, sIgA activity, aerobic bacteria, coliforms, and S. aureus. Mean protein values (95% confidence interval) were 1.5 g/dL (1.4, 1.6) for BANKED, 1.4 g/dL (1.3, 1.5) for MOM, 1.6 g/dL (1.5, 1.7) for SCREENED, and 1.5 g/dL (1.4, 1.6) for SHARED, which was not significantly different (p = .081). This research contributes to growing literature on the risks and benefits of uncompensated, peer-to-peer milk sharing.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsBacteria, AerobicBreast Milk ExpressionEnterobacteriaceaeFatsFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin ALactoseMilk BanksMilk, HumanMilk ProteinsMuramidaseNutrientsPilot ProjectsStaphylococcus aureusAnti-Infective AgentsFatsImmunoglobulin ALactoseMilk ProteinsMuramidaseNutrientshuman milk analysismilk sharingpeer-to-peer milk sharing

Identifiers

PMID30592165
PMCPMC6866159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.