Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30591857›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine reports2019

Predicting cervical cancer screening among sexual minority women using Classification and Regression Tree analysis.

Madelyne Z Greene, Tonda L Hughes, Alexandra Hanlon, Liming Huang, Marilyn S Sommers, Salimah H Meghani

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Improving cervical screening rates among sexual minorities: Insights from Aotearoa New Zealand.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Intersectionality in nursing research: A scoping review.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Madelyne Z GreeneUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 610 Walnut St. Suite #667, Madison 53726, WI, USA.
Tonda L HughesColumbia University School of Nursing, 560 W 168th St, New York 10032, NY, USA.
Alexandra HanlonUniversity of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, 418 Curie Blvd., Philadelphia 19126, PA, USA.
Liming HuangUniversity of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, 418 Curie Blvd., Philadelphia 19126, PA, USA.
Marilyn S SommersUniversity of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, 418 Curie Blvd., Philadelphia 19126, PA, USA.
Salimah H MeghaniUniversity of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, 418 Curie Blvd., Philadelphia 19126, PA, USA.
University of Pennsylvania · USColumbia University · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Impact of supportive policies on minority stress, drinking and health among womenR01AA013328 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI HUGHES, TONDA L, MATTHEWS, ALICIA K · 2002 to 2021
$8.0M
RESEARCH ON VULNERABLE WOMEN CHILDREN AND FAMILIEST32NR007100 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MEDOFF-COOPER, BARBARA S · 1998 to 2018
$7.2M
Health Disparities Research Scholars Training Program-RenewalT32HD049302 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Maureen S Durkin · 2007 to 2026
$5.6M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA013328NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD049302NINR NIH HHS T32 NR007100
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cervical cancer screening is a critical preventive healthcare service for all women. Sexual minority women (SMW) in the United States experience multiple health disparities including decreased access to and use of cervical cancer screening. The mechanisms driving these disparities are not clear and SMW with multiple marginalized identities may be more likely to miss recommended cervical cancer screening. This study aimed to identify subgroups of SMW that are more and less likely to be screened for cervical cancer according to American Cancer Society guidelines. We used cross-sectional data from the latest (2010-2012) wave of the Chicago Health and Life Experiences of Women (CHLEW) Study (N = 691). Informed by intersectionality theory, we performed classification and regression tree (CART) modeling to construct a data-driven, predictive model of subgroups of SMW who were more and less likely to receive guideline-recommended screening. Notably, the CART model did not include commonly tested variables such as race/ethnicity or level of income or education. The model did identify subgroups with low likelihood of receiving screening and several novel variables that may be important in understanding SMW's use of cervical cancer screening; lifetime number of sexual partners, age at drinking onset, childhood physical abuse, and internalized homonegativity. Our results point to the importance of early life experiences and identity development processes in shaping patterns of preventive healthcare use among adult SMW. Our analysis also demonstrated the potential value of CART modeling techniques for evaluating how multiple variables interact in complex ways to predict cervical cancer screening.

Identifiers

PMID30591857
PMCPMC6305684
OpenAlexW2900977886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.