Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30591652›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2018

Bone-Healing Pattern on the Surface of Titanium Implants at Cortical and Marrow Compartments in Two Topographic Sites: an Experimental Study in Rabbits.

David Soto-Peñaloza, Marco Caneva, José Viña-Almunia, José Javier Martín-de-Llano, David Peñarrocha-Oltra, Miguel Peñarrocha-Diago

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David Soto-PeñalozaOral Surgery and Implant Dentistry Division, Stomatology Department, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain. dr.davidsotpe@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-2443-5589
Marco CanevaARDEC Academy, Ariminum Odontologica, 47932 Rimini, Italy. marco.caneva@tiscali.it.
José Viña-AlmuniaOral Surgery and Implant Dentistry Division, Stomatology Department, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain. josevinaalmunia@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4324-4550
José Javier Martín-de-LlanoDepartment of Pathology and Health Research Institute of the Hospital Clínico (INCLIVA), Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain. j.javier.martin@uv.es.
David Peñarrocha-OltraOral Surgery and Implant Dentistry Division, Stomatology Department, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain. david.penarrocha@uv.es.ORCID 0000-0002-6670-9886
Miguel Peñarrocha-DiagoOral Surgery and Implant Dentistry Division, Stomatology Department, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain. miguel.penarrocha@uv.es.
Universitat de València · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluates the bone-healing patterns on the surface of titanium implants at the cortical and marrow compartments of bicortically-installed implants in the diaphysis and metaphysis of rabbit tibiae. In 27 New Zealand rabbits, two implants, one for each macro-design and with equal resorbable blasted media (RBM) implant surfaces, were randomly implanted in the diaphysis or metaphysis of each tibia. The flaps were sutured to allow submerged healing. The animals were sacrificed after two, four, or eight weeks, with nine weeks used for the period of healing. Ground sections were prepared and analyzed. No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups for newly formed bone in contact with the implant surface after two, four, and eight weeks of healing. Bone apposition in the marrow compartment was slightly higher in the diaphysis compared to metaphysis regions across healing stages. Despite the limitations of the present study, it can be concluded that new bone apposition was better than average in the cortical compartment as compared to the marrow compartments. Bone morphometry and density may affect bone apposition onto the implant surface. The apposition rates were slightly better at both the cortical and marrow compartments in diaphysis as compared to metaphysis sites. The new bone formation at the marrow compartment showed slightly better increasing values at diaphysis compared to metaphysis implantation sites.

Indexed as

animal studybicortical stabilizationdental implantimplant macro-designosseointegration

Identifiers

PMID30591652
PMCPMC6337604
OpenAlexW2907117960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.