ArticleCMAJ open
Benzodiazepine receptor agonist dispensations in Alberta: a population-based descriptive study.
Article in CMAJ open. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association between initial benzodiazepine prescribing patterns and time to benzodiazepine discontinuation: A population-based retrospective cohort study.PLoS medicine · 2026Article
- Impact of policy measures targeting benzodiazepines and Benzodiazepine-related drugs in Lithuania: interrupted time series analysis.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
- Supporting depression care: antidepressant prescribing patterns among adults in Alberta, Canada.BMC primary care · 2026Article
- The prevalence and factors associated with potentially inappropriate medications in Chinese older outpatients with heart failure.BMC geriatrics · 2024Article
- The epidemiology of benzodiazepine-related toxicity in Ontario, Canada: a population-based descriptive study.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2023Article
- Characterisation of concurrent use of prescription opioids and benzodiazepine/Z-drugs in Alberta, Canada: a population-based study.BMJ open · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is increasing concern over the use of benzodiazepine receptor agonists (BZRAs). The objective of this study was to describe BZRA dispensations in the province of Alberta in 2015 according to age, sex and appropriateness.
methodsA population-based descriptive study of people 10 years of age or older with at least 1 BZRA dispensation in Alberta, Canada, between Jan. 1 and Dec. 31, 2015, was conducted. Prevalence of BZRA use, characteristics of BZRAs dispensations, use at the individual level and appropriateness were determined.
resultsA total of 372 870 people received 2 463 585 BZRA dispensations in Alberta in 2015. Prevalence of use at the population level was 10% overall, increased with age (
interpretationThe prevalence of BZRA use was high and a substantial proportion of use appeared to be potentially inappropriate. This study supports the need for continued monitoring for the prescribing and use of these medications at the population level.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.