ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2019
High-Definition Zoom Mode, a High-Resolution X-Ray Microscope for Neurointerventional Treatment Procedures: A Blinded-Rater Clinical-Utility Study.
Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of pulsatile flow dynamics before and after endovascular intervention in 3D-printed patient-specific internal carotid artery aneurysm models using 1000 fps photon-counting detectors for Simultaneous Biplane High Speed Angiography (SB-HSA).Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2023Article
- High-Definition Zoom Mode: A High Resolution X-ray Microscope for Neurointerventional Treatment Procedures.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 7 countries.
Funding
Abstract
background and purposeQuality of visualization of treatment devices during critical stages of endovascular interventions, can directly impact their safety and efficacy. Our aim was to compare the visualization of neurointerventional procedures and treatment devices using a 194-μm pixel flat panel detector mode and a 76-μm pixel complementary metal oxide semiconductor detector mode (high definition) of a new-generation x-ray detector system using a blinded-rater study. MATERIALS AND
methodsDeployment of flow-diversion devices for the treatment of internal carotid artery aneurysms was performed under flat panel detector and high-definition-mode image guidance in a neurointerventional phantom simulating patient cranium and tissue attenuation, embedded with 3D-printed intracranial vascular models, each with an aneurysm in the ICA segment. Image-sequence pairs of device deployments for each detector mode, under similar exposure and FOV conditions, were evaluated by 2 blinded experienced neurointerventionalists who independently selected their preferred image on the basis of visualization of anatomic features, image noise, and treatment device. They rated their selection as either similar, better, much better, or substantially better than the other choice. Inter- and intrarater agreement was calculated and categorized as poor, moderate, and good.
resultsBoth raters demonstrating good inter- and intrarater agreement selected high-definition-mode images with a frequency of at least 95% each and, on average, rated the high-definition images as much better than flat panel detector images with a frequency of 73% from a total of 60 image pairs.
conclusionsDue to their higher resolution, high-definition-mode images are sharper and visually preferred compared with the flat panel detector images. The improved imaging provided by the high-definition mode can potentially provide an advantage during neurointerventional procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.