Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30591071›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's research & therapy2018

Comparative safety and effectiveness of cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine for Alzheimer's disease: a network meta-analysis of 41 randomized controlled trials.

Kai-Xin Dou, Meng-Shan Tan, Chen-Chen Tan, Xi-Peng Cao, Xiao-He Hou, Qi-Hao Guo, Lan Tan, Vincent Mok, Jin-Tai Yu

Open access · goldAbstract readNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's research & therapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 162 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. The Impact of Cognitive Impairment on Cardiovascular Disease.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2025
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Role of Saponins fromMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kai-Xin DouDepartment of Neurology, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao University, No. 5 Donghai Middle Road, Qingdao, China.
Meng-Shan TanDepartment of Neurology, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao University, No. 5 Donghai Middle Road, Qingdao, China.
Chen-Chen TanDepartment of Neurology, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao University, No. 5 Donghai Middle Road, Qingdao, China.
Xi-Peng CaoClinical Research Center, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Xiao-He HouDepartment of Neurology, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao University, No. 5 Donghai Middle Road, Qingdao, China.
Qi-Hao GuoDepartment of Neurology & Institute of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, WHO Collaborating Center for Research and Training in Neurosciences, Shanghai, China.
Lan TanDepartment of Neurology, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao University, No. 5 Donghai Middle Road, Qingdao, China. dr.tanlan@163.com.
Vincent MokDivision of Neurology, Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories Hong Kong, China.
Jin-Tai YuDepartment of Neurology, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao University, No. 5 Donghai Middle Road, Qingdao, China. yu-jintai@163.com.
Qingdao University · CNQingdao Municipal Hospital · CNChinese University of Hong Kong · CNHuashan Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCholinesterase inhibitors and memantine have been approved for management of Alzheimer's disease (AD), but there has been no consensus about the choice of various types and doses of drugs at different stages. Hence, we compared and ranked the efficacy and tolerability of these available drugs.

methodsWe searched PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Embase for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published from database inception to July 21, 2017. The primary outcomes were the mean overall changes in cognitive function and responders who had any adverse events. We conducted a random-effects network meta-analysis.

resultsForty-one RCTs were included in this study. Compared with placebo, galantamine 32 mg daily (standardized mean difference - 0.51, 95% credible interval - 0.67 to - 0.35), galantamine 24 mg daily (- 0.50, - 0.61 to - 0.40), and donepezil 10 mg daily (- 0.40, - 0.51 to - 0.29) were probably the most effective agents on cognition for mild to moderate AD, and memantine 20 mg combined with donepezil 10 mg (0.76, 0.39 to 1.11) was recommended for moderate to severe patients. Memantine showed the best profile of acceptability. Rivastigmine transdermal 15-cm

conclusionsPharmacological interventions have beneficial effects on cognition, function, and global changes, but not on neuropsychiatric symptoms, through current network meta-analysis. The choice of drugs may mainly depend on the disease severity and clinical symptoms.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCholinesterase InhibitorsFemaleHumansMaleMemantineNootropic AgentsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeCholinesterase InhibitorsMemantineNootropic AgentsAlzheimer’s diseaseCholinesterase inhibitorsMemantineNetwork meta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID30591071
PMCPMC6309083
OpenAlexW2907817008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.