Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30591069›Full record

ArticleImplementation science : IS2018

Improving inappropriate medication and information transfer at hospital discharge: study protocol for a cluster RCT.

Thomas Grischott, Stefan Zechmann, Yael Rachamin, Stefan Markun, Corinne Chmiel, Oliver Senn, Thomas Rosemann, Nicolas Rodondi, Stefan Neuner-Jehle

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial ProtocolComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science : IS, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Discharge planning from hospital.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas GrischottInstitute of Primary Care (IHAMZ), University and University Hospital of Zurich, Pestalozzistrasse 24, CH-8091, Zurich, Switzerland. thomas.grischott@usz.ch.ORCID 0000-0002-1564-5296
Stefan ZechmannInstitute of Primary Care (IHAMZ), University and University Hospital of Zurich, Pestalozzistrasse 24, CH-8091, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5012-0068
Yael RachaminInstitute of Primary Care (IHAMZ), University and University Hospital of Zurich, Pestalozzistrasse 24, CH-8091, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1484-6934
Stefan MarkunInstitute of Primary Care (IHAMZ), University and University Hospital of Zurich, Pestalozzistrasse 24, CH-8091, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-3317-0957
Corinne ChmielInstitute of Primary Care (IHAMZ), University and University Hospital of Zurich, Pestalozzistrasse 24, CH-8091, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-5249-6592
Oliver SennInstitute of Primary Care (IHAMZ), University and University Hospital of Zurich, Pestalozzistrasse 24, CH-8091, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4422-7250
Thomas RosemannInstitute of Primary Care (IHAMZ), University and University Hospital of Zurich, Pestalozzistrasse 24, CH-8091, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-6436-6306
Nicolas RodondiInstitute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9083-6896
Stefan Neuner-JehleInstitute of Primary Care (IHAMZ), University and University Hospital of Zurich, Pestalozzistrasse 24, CH-8091, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-6260-8148
University Hospital of Zurich · CHUniversity of Bern · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInappropriate medication and polypharmacy increase morbidity, hospitalisation rate, costs and mortality in multimorbid patients. At hospital discharge of elderly patients, polypharmacy is often even more pronounced than at admission. However, the optimal discharge strategy in view of sustained medication appropriateness remains unclear. In particular, unreflectingly switching back to the pre-hospitalisation medication must be avoided. Therefore, both the patients and the follow-up physicians should be involved in the discharge process. In this study, we aim to test whether a brief medication review which takes the patients' priorities into account, combined with a standardised communication strategy at hospital discharge, leads to sustained medication appropriateness and extends readmission times among elderly multimorbid patients.

methodsThe study is designed as a two-armed, double-blinded, cluster-randomised trial, involving 42 senior hospital physicians (HPs) with their junior HPs and 2100 multimorbid patients aged 60 years or older. Using a randomised minimisation strategy, senior HPs will be assigned to either intervention or control group. Following instructions of the study team, the senior HPs in the intervention group will teach their junior HPs how to integrate a simple medication review tool combined with a defined communication strategy into their ward's discharge procedure. The untrained HPs in the control group will provide data on usual care, and their patients will be discharged following usual local routines. Primary outcome is the time until readmission within 6 months after discharge, and secondary outcomes cover readmission rates, number of emergency and GP visits, classes and numbers of drugs prescribed, proportions of potentially inappropriate medications, and the patients' quality of life after discharge. Additionally, the characteristics of both the HPs as well as the patients will be collected before the intervention. Process evaluation outcomes will be assessed parallel to the ongoing core study using qualitative research methods. DISCUSSION: So far, interventions to reduce polypharmacy are still scarce at the crucial interface between HPs and GPs. To our knowledge, this trial is the first to analyse the combination of a brief deprescribing intervention with a standardised communication strategy at hospital discharge and in the early post-discharge period.

trial registrationISRCTN, ISRCTN18427377 . Registered 11 January 2018.

Indexed as

Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicAgedCluster AnalysisCommunicationData CollectionDouble-Blind MethodDrug Utilization ReviewElectronic Health RecordsGeneral PracticeHospital Information SystemsHumansInappropriate PrescribingMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient DischargePatient ReadmissionCluster-randomised controlled trialDeprescribingHospital dischargeMedication reviewMultimorbidityPatient prioritiesPolypharmacyPotentially inappropriate medication

Identifiers

PMID30591069
PMCPMC6309068
OpenAlexW2907000853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.