Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30591058›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2018

To what degree can variations in readmission rates be explained on the level of the hospital? a multilevel study using a large Dutch database.

Karin Hekkert, Rudolf B Kool, Ester Rake, Sezgin Cihangir, Ine Borghans, Femke Atsma, Gert Westert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Trends and variation in benzodiazepine use in nursing homes in the USA.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Karin HekkertRadboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcare, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. karin.hekkert@radboudumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6934-5432
Rudolf B KoolRadboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcare, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Ester RakeDutch Hospital Data, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Sezgin CihangirDutch Hospital Data, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Ine BorghansDutch Health and Youth Care Inspectorate (IGJ), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Femke AtsmaRadboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcare, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Gert WestertRadboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcare, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt is not clear which part of the variation in hospital readmissions can be attributed to the standard of care hospitals provide. This is in spite of their widespread use as an indicator of a lower quality of care. The aim of this study is to assess the variation in readmissions on the hospital level after adjusting for case-mix factors.

methodsWe performed multilevel logistic regression analyses with a random intercept for the factor 'hospital' to estimate the variance on the hospital level after adjustment for case-mix variables. We used administrative data from 53 Dutch hospitals from 2010 to 2012 (58% of all Dutch hospitals; 2,577,053 admissions). We calculated models for the top ten diagnosis groups with the highest number of readmissions after an index admission for a surgical procedure. We calculated intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) per diagnosis group in order to explore the variation in readmissions between hospitals. Furthermore, we determined C-statistics for the models with and without a random effect on the hospital level to determine the discriminative ability.

resultsThe ICCs on the hospital level ranged from 0.48 to 2.70% per diagnosis group. The C-statistics of the models with a random effect on the hospital level ranged from 0.58 to 0.65 for the different diagnosis groups. The C-statistics of the models that included the hospital level were higher compared to the models without this level.

conclusionsFor some diagnosis groups, a small part of the explained variation in readmissions was found on the hospital level, after adjusting for case-mix variables. However, the C-statistics of the prediction models are moderate, so the discriminative ability is limited. Readmission indicators might be useful for identifying areas for improving quality within hospitals on the level of diagnosis or specialty.

Indexed as

Databases, FactualHospitalsHumansNetherlandsPatient ReadmissionProcess Assessment, Health CareQuality ImprovementQuality of Health CareRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeHealthcare quality indicatorMultilevel analysisPatient readmission

Identifiers

PMID30591058
PMCPMC6307249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.