ArticleEnvironmental health : a global access science source2018
The global environmental injustice of fast fashion.
Article in Environmental health : a global access science source, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- 'Pride not profit': A commercial determinants of Indigenous health case study from Australia.Globalization and health · 2026Article
- A decision support model for efficient garment reprocessing for a sustainable circular business model.The International journal, advanced manufacturing technology · 2026Article
- Secondhand fashion consumers exhibit fast fashion behaviors despite sustainability narratives.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Electrospun Polymeric Film in Red BF-4B Dye Degradation.Polymers · 2025Article
- Weave structures of polyester fabric affect the tensile strength and microplastic fiber emission during the laundry process.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Successful cultivation of edible fungi on textile waste offers a new avenue for bioremediation and potential food production.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- The impact of climate change on the lives and livelihoods of readymade garment (RMG) workers: an exploratory study in selected readymade garment factories in Bangladesh.BMC public health · 2023Article
- Converting textile waste into value-added chemicals: An integrated bio-refinery process.Environmental science and ecotechnology · 2023Article
- Filamentous Fungi Are Potential Bioremediation Agents of Semi-Synthetic Textile Waste.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Mycelium-Based Composite Materials: Study of Acceptance.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- The perception of circular economy in the framework of fashion industry.Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA · 2023Article
- Study on the Pyrolysis and Adsorption Behavior of Activated Carbon Derived from Waste Polyester Textiles with Different Metal Salts.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- A proposed checklist for climate-friendly sport and exercise programmes.European journal of public health · 2022Article
- Azo-Dye-Functionalized Polycarbonate Membranes for Textile Dye and Nitrate Ion Removal.Micromachines · 2022Article
- Analysis of the polyester clothing value chain to identify key intervention points for sustainability.Environmental sciences Europe · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fast fashion, inexpensive and widely available of-the-moment garments, has changed the way people buy and dispose of clothing. By selling large quantities of clothing at cheap prices, fast fashion has emerged as a dominant business model, causing garment consumption to skyrocket. While this transition is sometimes heralded as the "democratization" of fashion in which the latest styles are available to all classes of consumers, the human and environmental health risks associated with inexpensive clothing are hidden throughout the lifecycle of each garment. From the growth of water-intensive cotton, to the release of untreated dyes into local water sources, to worker's low wages and poor working conditions; the environmental and social costs involved in textile manufacturing are widespread.In this paper, we posit that negative externalities at each step of the fast fashion supply chain have created a global environmental justice dilemma. While fast fashion offers consumers an opportunity to buy more clothes for less, those who work in or live near textile manufacturing facilities bear a disproportionate burden of environmental health hazards. Furthermore, increased consumption patterns have also created millions of tons of textile waste in landfills and unregulated settings. This is particularly applicable to low and middle-income countries (LMICs) as much of this waste ends up in second-hand clothing markets. These LMICs often lack the supports and resources necessary to develop and enforce environmental and occupational safeguards to protect human health. We discuss the role of industry, policymakers, consumers, and scientists in promoting sustainable production and ethical consumption in an equitable manner.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.