Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30591015›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2018

A multitask bi-directional RNN model for named entity recognition on Chinese electronic medical records.

Shanta Chowdhury, Xishuang Dong, Lijun Qian, Xiangfang Li, Yi Guan, Jinfeng Yang, Qiubin Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. An analysis of FRE @ BC8 SympTEMIST track: named entity recognition.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Confidence interval for micro-averagedApplied intelligence (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shanta ChowdhuryCenter of Excellence in Research and Education for Big Military Data Intelligence (CREDIT), Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Prairie View A&M University, Texas A&M University System, Prairie View, Texas, 77446, USA.
Xishuang DongCenter of Excellence in Research and Education for Big Military Data Intelligence (CREDIT), Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Prairie View A&M University, Texas A&M University System, Prairie View, Texas, 77446, USA.
Lijun QianCenter of Excellence in Research and Education for Big Military Data Intelligence (CREDIT), Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Prairie View A&M University, Texas A&M University System, Prairie View, Texas, 77446, USA.
Xiangfang LiCenter of Excellence in Research and Education for Big Military Data Intelligence (CREDIT), Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Prairie View A&M University, Texas A&M University System, Prairie View, Texas, 77446, USA. xili@pvamu.edu.
Yi GuanSchools of Computer Science and Technology, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China.
Jinfeng YangSchools of Software, Harbin University of Science and Technology, Harbin, China.
Qiubin YuSecond Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElectronic Medical Record (EMR) comprises patients' medical information gathered by medical stuff for providing better health care. Named Entity Recognition (NER) is a sub-field of information extraction aimed at identifying specific entity terms such as disease, test, symptom, genes etc. NER can be a relief for healthcare providers and medical specialists to extract useful information automatically and avoid unnecessary and unrelated information in EMR. However, limited resources of available EMR pose a great challenge for mining entity terms. Therefore, a multitask bi-directional RNN model is proposed here as a potential solution of data augmentation to enhance NER performance with limited data.

methodsA multitask bi-directional RNN model is proposed for extracting entity terms from Chinese EMR. The proposed model can be divided into a shared layer and a task specific layer. Firstly, vector representation of each word is obtained as a concatenation of word embedding and character embedding. Then Bi-directional RNN is used to extract context information from sentence. After that, all these layers are shared by two different task layers, namely the parts-of-speech tagging task layer and the named entity recognition task layer. These two tasks layers are trained alternatively so that the knowledge learned from named entity recognition task can be enhanced by the knowledge gained from parts-of-speech tagging task.

resultsThe performance of our proposed model has been evaluated in terms of micro average F-score, macro average F-score and accuracy. It is observed that the proposed model outperforms the baseline model in all cases. For instance, experimental results conducted on the discharge summaries show that the micro average F-score and the macro average F-score are improved by 2.41% point and 4.16% point, respectively, and the overall accuracy is improved by 5.66% point.

conclusionsIn this paper, a novel multitask bi-directional RNN model is proposed for improving the performance of named entity recognition in EMR. Evaluation results using real datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed model.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsLanguageModels, TheoreticalChinaHumansInformation Storage and RetrievalElectronic medical recordsMultitask learningNamed entity recognitionParts-of-speech taggingRecurrent neural networkWord embedding

Identifiers

PMID30591015
PMCPMC6309059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.