ArticleBMC bioinformatics2018
Reconstructing high-resolution chromosome three-dimensional structures by Hi-C complex networks.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- LAWS-HiC: A Locally Adaptive Weighting and Screening (LAWS) Approach to Improve Detection of Long-Range Chromatin Interactions from Hi-C Data.Methods and protocols · 2026Article
- The challenge of chromatin model comparison and validation: A project from the first international 4D Nucleome Hackathon.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Loop Catalog: a comprehensive HiChIP database of human and mouse samples.Genome biology · 2025Article
- scHiMe: predicting single-cell DNA methylation levels based on single-cell Hi-C data.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2023Article
- NucleoMap: A computational tool for identifying nucleosomes in ultra-high resolution contact maps.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Article
- Perspectives for the reconstruction of 3D chromatin conformation using single cell Hi-C data.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Inferring Single-Cell 3D Chromosomal Structures Based on the Lennard-Jones Potential.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Computational approaches for inferring 3D conformations of chromatin from chromosome conformation capture data.Methods (San Diego, Calif.) · 2020Review
- normGAM: an R package to remove systematic biases in genome architecture mapping data.BMC genomics · 2019Article
- HiCNN2: Enhancing the Resolution of Hi-C Data Using an Ensemble of Convolutional Neural Networks.Genes · 2019Article
- TADKB: Family classification and a knowledge base of topologically associating domains.BMC genomics · 2019Article
- The International Conference on Intelligent Biology and Medicine (ICIBM) 2018: bioinformatics towards translational applications.BMC bioinformatics · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHi-C data have been widely used to reconstruct chromosomal three-dimensional (3D) structures. One of the key limitations of Hi-C is the unclear relationship between spatial distance and the number of Hi-C contacts. Many methods used a fixed parameter when converting the number of Hi-C contacts to wish distances. However, a single parameter cannot properly explain the relationship between wish distances and genomic distances or the locations of topologically associating domains (TADs).
resultsWe have addressed one of the key issues of using Hi-C data, that is, the unclear relationship between spatial distances and the number of Hi-C contacts, which is crucial to understand significant biological functions, such as the enhancer-promoter interactions. Specifically, we developed a new method to infer this converting parameter and pairwise Euclidean distances based on the topology of the Hi-C complex network (HiCNet). The inferred distances were modeled by clustering coefficient and multiple other types of constraints. We found that our inferred distances between bead-pairs within the same TAD were apparently smaller than those distances between bead-pairs from different TADs. Our inferred distances had a higher correlation with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) data, fitted the localization patterns of Xist transcripts on DNA, and better matched 156 pairs of protein-enabled long-range chromatin interactions detected by ChIA-PET. Using the inferred distances and another round of optimization, we further reconstructed 40 kb high-resolution 3D chromosomal structures of mouse male ES cells. The high-resolution structures successfully illustrate TADs and DNA loops (peaks in Hi-C contact heatmaps) that usually indicate enhancer-promoter interactions.
conclusionsWe developed a novel method to infer the wish distances between DNA bead-pairs from Hi-C contacts. High-resolution 3D structures of chromosomes were built based on the newly-inferred wish distances. This whole process has been implemented as a tool named HiCNet, which is publicly available at http://dna.cs.miami.edu/HiCNet/ .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.