Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30590867›Full record

ArticleVox sanguinis2019

Donor InSight: characteristics and representativeness of a Dutch cohort study on blood and plasma donors.

Tiffany C Timmer, Rosa de Groot, Karin Habets, Eva-Maria Merz, Femmeke J Prinsze, Femke Atsma, Wim L A M de Kort, Katja van den Hurk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vox sanguinis, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Equity in blood transfusion precision services.International journal for equity in health · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Beyond Description: The Predictive Role of Affect, Memory, and Context in the Decision to Donate or Not Donate Blood.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2020
    Review
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tiffany C TimmerDepartment of Donor Medicine Research - Donor Studies, Sanquin Research, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Rosa de GrootDepartment of Donor Medicine Research - Donor Studies, Sanquin Research, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1103-915X
Karin HabetsRegional Emergency Healthcare Network, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Eva-Maria MerzDepartment of Donor Medicine Research - Donor Studies, Sanquin Research, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5567-7041
Femmeke J PrinszeDepartment of Donor Medicine Research - Donor Studies, Sanquin Research, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Femke AtsmaScientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Wim L A M de KortDepartment of Donor Medicine Research - Donor Studies, Sanquin Research, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Katja van den HurkDepartment of Donor Medicine Research - Donor Studies, Sanquin Research, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

Sanquin's Fund for Product and Process Development Cellular Products PPOC 14-028Sanquin's Fund for Product and Process Development Cellular Products PPOC-14-DS-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesMore insight into donor health and behaviour may contribute to more efficient and focused strategies regarding donor care and management. Donor InSight (DIS) is a Dutch cohort study of blood and plasma donors. We aimed to outline the objectives and methods of DIS, describe the cohort, and compare it to the active Dutch donor population. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn 2007-2009 (DIS-I, n = 31 338) and 2012-2013 (DIS-II, 34 826, of whom 22 132 also participated in DIS-I) questionnaire data on demographics, donation, lifestyle, family composition, health and disease were collected. A second follow-up (DIS-III, n = 3046), including donors with differing haemoglobin trajectories, was completed in 2015-2016. DIS-III includes data on genetic determinants, iron and red cell indices. Representativeness of the DIS-I sample for the entire Dutch donor population was assessed by comparing characteristics of both.

resultsDonor InSight was initially set up because of a need for more detailed information and evidence as a basis for decision-making in blood banks. DIS-I sample is comparable to the total Dutch donor population in terms of age, body mass index, haemoglobin level, blood pressure, blood type and donation behaviour.

conclusionDonor InSight is a cohort study representative of the Dutch donor population. It provides evidence to support evidence-based decision making.

Indexed as

AdultBlood BanksBlood DonorsCohort StudiesDemographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsblood donorsdemographicsdonor healthepidemiologylifestyle

Identifiers

PMID30590867
PMCPMC7379571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.