Trial reportRheumatology (Oxford, England)2019
Safety and tolerability of subcutaneous sarilumab and intravenous tocilizumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Trial report in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 59 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy Study Assessing The Safety and Tolerability of Sarilumab and Tocilizumab In Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Are Inadequate Responders to or Intolerant of TNF Antagonists
Single-dose Study to Describe the Pharmacodynamics (PD) and Safety of Sarilumab (REGN88/SAR153191) and Tocilizumab in Adults With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
Who cites it
59 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 124 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative safety of interleukin inhibitors for rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of current therapies for difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Journal of translational medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Risk of Multiple Sclerosis Among Users of Antitumor Necrosis Factor α in 4 Canadian Provinces: A Population-Based Study.Neurology · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- IL-6 inhibition in the treatment of COVID-19: A meta-analysis and meta-regression.The Journal of infection · 2021Pooled it
- Sarilumab in Polyarticular-Course Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Dose-Finding and 1-Year Analysis of a Phase 2b, Open-Label, Multicenter Study.Arthritis care & research · 2026Trial
- A phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sarilumab in patients with giant cell arteritis.Arthritis research & therapy · 2023Trial
- Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and efficacy of WBP216, a novel IL-6 monoclonal antibody, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A phase Ia randomized placebo-controlled study.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Trial
- Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Subcutaneous Sarilumab and Intravenous Tocilizumab Following Single-Dose Administration in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis on Stable Methotrexate.Journal of clinical pharmacology · 2021Trial
- High levels of interleukin-6 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis are associated with greater improvements in health-related quality of life for sarilumab compared with adalimumab.Arthritis research & therapy · 2020Trial
- Population Pharmacokinetics of Sarilumab in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2019Trial
- Two years of sarilumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to MTX: safety, efficacy and radiographic outcomes.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2018Trial
- Efficacy and safety of sarilumab monotherapy versus adalimumab monotherapy for the treatment of patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (MONARCH): a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group phase III trial.Annals of the rheumatic diseases · 2017Trial
- Interleukins in Major Depressive Disorder: Lessons From Autoimmune Diseases and Pathways to Clinical Translation.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2026Review
- Tocilizumab-associated oral ulcerations: a case report and scoping review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Targeting IL-6 Signaling: Safety and Effectiveness in Older Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.Drugs & aging · 2025Review
- From joints to vessels: How rheumatoid arthritis therapy alters the fate of the heart.World journal of cardiology · 2025Review
- Tocilizumab, a Humanized Anti-interleukin-6 Receptor Antibody, Induces Hepatic Iron Overload in a Susceptible Patient.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2025Article
- Proteasome Inhibitors: Potential in Rheumatoid Arthritis Therapy?International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Abatacept, Golimumab, and Sarilumab as Selected Bio-Originator Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs with Diverse Mechanisms of Action in Their Current Use in Treatment.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveSafety and efficacy of mAbs blocking the IL-6 receptor have been established in RA. This is the first analysis examining safety and tolerability of sarilumab and tocilizumab administered as single or multiple doses in patients with RA within the same study.
methodsIn ASCERTAIN, patients were randomized 1: 1: 2 to 24 weeks' double-blind sarilumab 150 or 200 mg every 2 weeks s.c. or tocilizumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks i.v., increased to 8 mg/kg if clinically indicated. In Study 1309, patients were randomized 1: 1: 1: 1 to single-dose open-label sarilumab 150 or 200 mg s.c. or tocilizumab 4 or 8 mg/kg i.v.
resultsIn ASCERTAIN, incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was similar between sarilumab and tocilizumab. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were the following: sarilumab: neutropenia [6 patients (12.2%) in the 150 mg group and 8 (15.7%) in the 200 mg group], nasopharyngitis [6 (12.2%) and 3 (5.9%)], and injection-site erythema [4 (8.2%) and 4 (7.8%)]; tocilizumab: accidental overdose [9 (8.8%)], upper respiratory tract infection [7 (6.9%)] and nausea [7 (6.9%)]. Laboratory changes in both studies included decreased neutrophils and platelets and increased transaminases and lipids. In Study 1309, incidence of absolute neutrophil count <1.0 giga/l was similar between sarilumab and tocilizumab, and occurred more frequently in the higher dose groups. No association between decrease in absolute neutrophil count and increased incidence of infection was observed in either study.
conclusionNo clinically meaningful differences in treatment-emergent adverse events were observed between sarilumab and tocilizumab. Laboratory changes with sarilumab were within the same range as those with tocilizumab. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: ASCERTAIN (NCT01768572); Study 1309 (NCT02097524).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.