Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30590748›Full record

ArticleRheumatology (Oxford, England)2019

Predictive factors and biomarkers for the 2-year outcome of uveitis in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: data from the Inception Cohort of Newly diagnosed patients with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (ICON-JIA) study.

Arnd Heiligenhaus, Jens Klotsche, Christoph Tappeiner, Claudia Sengler, Martina Niewerth, Ina Liedmann, Sabine Hoeft, Karoline Walscheid, Miha Lavric, Dirk Foell and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Uveitis in Children and Adolescents.Rheumatic diseases clinics of North America · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Arnd HeiligenhausDepartment of Ophthalmology at St Franziskus Hospital, University of Duisburg-Essen, Münster.
Jens KlotscheGerman Rheumatism Research Center, a Leibniz Institute, Berlin.
Christoph TappeinerDepartment of Ophthalmology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Claudia SenglerGerman Rheumatism Research Center, a Leibniz Institute, Berlin.
Martina NiewerthGerman Rheumatism Research Center, a Leibniz Institute, Berlin.
Ina LiedmannGerman Rheumatism Research Center, a Leibniz Institute, Berlin.
Sabine HoeftOphthalmology, Bonn.
Karoline WalscheidDepartment of Ophthalmology at St Franziskus Hospital, University of Duisburg-Essen, Münster.
Miha LavricDepartment of Paediatric Rheumatology and Immunology, University of Muenster, Münster.
Dirk FoellDepartment of Paediatric Rheumatology and Immunology, University of Muenster, Münster.
Kirsten MindenGerman Rheumatism Research Center, a Leibniz Institute, Berlin.
German Rheumatism Research Centre · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEUniversity of Münster · DESt. Franziskus Hospital · DEUniversity Hospital of Bern · CHUniversity of Duisburg-Essen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo define predictors for the 2-year outcome in terms of achieving inactivity, subsequent uveitis reactivation and occurrence of uveitis-related complications of JIA-associated uveitis.

methodsDemographic and clinical parameters and serum samples of JIA-associated uveitis patients enrolled in ICON at ⩽1 year of JIA diagnosis were collected at study enrolment, every 3 months during the first year and subsequently every 6 months. Predictors for the 2-year outcome were evaluated by linear mixed models.

resultsOf 954 JIA patients included, uveitis occurred in 106 up to the first 2-year follow-up, with 98 of them having complete ophthalmological documentation. In 81.8% and 80.0% of patients, uveitis inactivity was achieved at the 1- and 2-year follow-up after uveitis onset, respectively. JIA onset after the age of 5 years, no use of topical corticosteroids, and adalimumab treatment were significantly associated with an inactive uveitis for at least 6 months (n = 57). Correlates for subsequent uveitis reactivation (n = 16, 30.2%) were age at uveitis onset ⩽5 years and active disease (clinical Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score >4.5). Uveitis-related complications were present in 29.8% of patients at first uveitis documentation and in 30.7% and 32.8% at 1- and 2-year follow-up, respectively. Older age at JIA onset, short duration between JIA and uveitis onset, high anterior chamber (AC) cell grades, poor visual acuity, and topical steroid use at first uveitis documentation correlated with uveitis-related complications.

conclusionIn addition to demographic risk factors, JIA disease and uveitis activity scores and adalimumab are significant predictors for the 2-year outcome of JIA-associated uveitis patients.

Indexed as

AdalimumabAdministration, TopicalAdrenal Cortex HormonesAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, JuvenileBiomarkersChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansIncidenceLinear ModelsMaleProspective StudiesRisk FactorsSeverity of Illness IndexAdalimumabAdrenal Cortex HormonesAntirheumatic AgentsBiomarkersadalimumabDMARDsjuvenile idiopathic arthritispredictorsuveitis

Identifiers

PMID30590748
PMCPMC6532445
OpenAlexW2907077940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.