Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30590701›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2019

Hidden sequence specificity in loading of single-stranded RNAs onto Drosophila Argonautes.

Eling Goh, Katsutomo Okamura

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Eling GohTemasek Life Sciences Laboratory, 1 Research Link, National University of Singapore 117604, Singapore.
Katsutomo OkamuraTemasek Life Sciences Laboratory, 1 Research Link, National University of Singapore 117604, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Argonaute proteins play important roles in gene regulation with small RNAs (sRNAs) serving as guides to targets. Argonautes are believed to bind sRNAs in a sequence non-specific manner. However, we recently discovered that Argonautes selectively load endogenous single-stranded (ss) RNAs, suggesting that Argonaute loading may conform to sequence specificity. To identify sequences preferred for Argonaute loading, we have developed HIgh-throughput Sequencing mediated Specificity Analysis (HISSA). HISSA allows massively parallel analysis of RNA binding efficiency by using randomized oligos in in vitro binding assays and quantifying RNAs by deep-sequencing. We chose Drosophila as a model system to take advantage of the presence of two biochemically distinct Argonautes, AGO1 and AGO2. Our results revealed AGO2 loading to be strongly favored by G-rich sequences. In contrast, AGO1 showed an enrichment of the 'GAC' motif in loaded species. Reanalysis of published sRNA sequencing data from fly tissues detected enrichment of the GAC motif in ssRNA-derived small RNAs in the immunopurified AGO1-complex under certain conditions, suggesting that the sequence preference of AGO1-loading may influence the repertoire of AGO1-bound endogenous sRNAs. Finally, we showed that human Ago2 also exhibited selectivity in loading ssRNAs in cell lysates. These findings may have implications for therapeutic ssRNA-mediated gene silencing.

Indexed as

AnimalsArgonaute ProteinsDNA, Single-StrandedDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansRNA-Induced Silencing ComplexAGO1 protein, DrosophilaAGO2 protein, DrosophilaArgonaute ProteinsDNA, Single-StrandedDrosophila ProteinsRNA-Induced Silencing Complex

Identifiers

PMID30590701
PMCPMC6451100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.