Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30590692›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2019

Influence of Recombination and GC-biased Gene Conversion on the Adaptive and Nonadaptive Substitution Rate in Mammals versus Birds.

Marjolaine Rousselle, Alexandre Laverré, Emeric Figuet, Benoit Nabholz, Nicolas Galtier

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Marjolaine RousselleISEM, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, EPHE, Montpellier, France.
Alexandre LaverréISEM, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, EPHE, Montpellier, France.
Emeric FiguetISEM, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, EPHE, Montpellier, France.
Benoit NabholzISEM, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, EPHE, Montpellier, France.
Nicolas GaltierISEM, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, EPHE, Montpellier, France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRÉcole Pratique des Hautes Études · FRInstitut de Recherche pour le Développement · FRInstitut des Sciences de l'Evolution de Montpellier · FRUniversité de Montpellier · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recombination is expected to affect functional sequence evolution in several ways. On the one hand, recombination is thought to improve the efficiency of multilocus selection by dissipating linkage disequilibrium. On the other hand, natural selection can be counteracted by recombination-associated transmission distorters such as GC-biased gene conversion (gBGC), which tends to promote G and C alleles irrespective of their fitness effect in high-recombining regions. It has been suggested that gBGC might impact coding sequence evolution in vertebrates, and particularly the ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous substitution rates (dN/dS). However, distinctive gBGC patterns have been reported in mammals and birds, maybe reflecting the documented contrasts in evolutionary dynamics of recombination rate between these two taxa. Here, we explore how recombination and gBGC affect coding sequence evolution in mammals and birds by analyzing proteome-wide data in six species of Galloanserae (fowls) and six species of catarrhine primates. We estimated the dN/dS ratio and rates of adaptive and nonadaptive evolution in bins of genes of increasing recombination rate, separately analyzing AT → GC, GC → AT, and G ↔ C/A ↔ T mutations. We show that in both taxa, recombination and gBGC entail a decrease in dN/dS. Our analysis indicates that recombination enhances the efficiency of purifying selection by lowering Hill-Robertson effects, whereas gBGC leads to an overestimation of the adaptive rate of AT → GC mutations. Finally, we report a mutagenic effect of recombination, which is independent of gBGC.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGene ConversionAnimalsPoultryPrimatesadaptive substitution ratebirdscoding sequence evolutionGC-biased gene conversionprimatesrecombination

Identifiers

PMID30590692
PMCPMC6389324
OpenAlexW2906684375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.