ArticleJournal of experimental botany2019
High-throughput sequencing data and the impact of plant gene annotation quality.
Article in Journal of experimental botany, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Foliar application of gamma aminobutyric acid regulates sulfur metabolism and restores redox balance to improve aluminum tolerance inPlant signaling & behavior · 2026Article
- Identification of annotation artifacts concerning the chalcone synthase (CHS).BMC research notes · 2023Article
- High-qualityFrontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- A chromosome-level, haplotype-phased Vanilla planifolia genome highlights the challenge of partial endoreplication for accurate whole-genome assembly.Plant communications · 2022Article
- CarrotOmics: a genetics and comparative genomics database for carrot (Daucus carota).Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2022Article
- Evaluating Plant Gene Models Using Machine Learning.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Green plant genomes: What we know in an era of rapidly expanding opportunities.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- Pangenome-wide analysis of cyclic nucleotide-gated channel (CNGC) gene family in citrusFrontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Mining oomycete proteomes for metalloproteases leads to identification of candidate virulence factors in Phytophthora infestans.Molecular plant pathology · 2021Article
- Article
- A homology-guided, genome-based proteome for improved proteomics in the alloploid Nicotiana benthamiana.BMC genomics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of draft genomes of different species and re-sequencing of accessions and populations are now common tools for plant biology research. The de novo assembled draft genomes make it possible to identify pivotal divergence points in the plant lineage and provide an opportunity to investigate the genomic basis and timing of biological innovations by inferring orthologs between species. Furthermore, re-sequencing facilitates the mapping and subsequent molecular characterization of causative loci for traits, such as those for plant stress tolerance and development. In both cases high-quality gene annotation-the identification of protein-coding regions, gene promoters, and 5'- and 3'-untranslated regions-is critical for investigation of gene function. Annotations are constantly improving but automated gene annotations still require manual curation and experimental validation. This is particularly important for genes with large introns, genes located in regions rich with transposable elements or repeats, large gene families, and segmentally duplicated genes. In this opinion paper, we highlight the impact of annotation quality on evolutionary analyses, genome-wide association studies, and the identification of orthologous genes in plants. Furthermore, we predict that incorporating accurate information from manual curation into databases will dramatically improve the performance of automated gene predictors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.