ArticlePloS one2018
Maternal genetic and phylogenetic characteristics of domesticated cattle in northwestern China.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Large-Scale Comparative Genomics of European and Chinese Cattle Breeds Reveals Population Structure, Breeding History, and Adaptive Divergence.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Genetic Diversification and Population Admixture Signatures in Yunnan Native Cattle.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- The Genomic Landscape of Cattle: Domestication, Dispersal, and Adaptive Evolution.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Review
- Estimation of Genetic Parameters of Reproductive Traits in Holstein Cattle from Southern China.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Maternal Genetic Diversity Analysis of Guanling Cattle by Mitochondrial Genome Sequencing.Biochemical genetics · 2025Article
- Genetic Origin and Introgression Pattern of Pingliang Red Cattle Revealed Using Genome-Wide SNP Analyses.Genes · 2023Article
- Article
- Cattle mitogenome variation reveals a post-glacial expansion of haplogroup P and an early incorporation into northeast Asian domestic herds.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Multiple Domestication Centers Revealed by the Geographical Distribution of Chinese Native Pigs.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Northwestern China, an important part of the Silk Road, was the birthplace of the Zhouzu farming culture. The domestication of cattle as an important aspect of farming culture has had a long history in northwestern China. In this study, we assessed the maternal structure and phylogeny of cattle by analyzing the mitochondrial DNA hypervariable segment I (HVS-I) in 698 native cattle from eight areas of northwestern China. The phylogenetic analyses revealed two highly divergent mtDNA clades: clade T, which had four sub-clades (Ta-Td), and clade I. The cattle domesticated from Bos taurus showed a clear dominant distribution pattern in northwestern China. The nucleotide diversity of the Bos indicus clade was lower than that of clades from Bos taurus. In summary, our results suggest that the native cattle of northwestern China were domesticated from two different maternal ancestors, Bos taurus and Bos indicus, which migrated to the central plains of China from the north and south, respectively, with Bos taurus remaining at the edges of the region. The population expansion of the cattle domesticated from Bos taurus occurred in the Longdong region of Gansu Province, and these cattle formed four relatively independent evolutionary branches. Subsequent to this expansion event, Bos indicus migrated from southern to northern China.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.