Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30589779›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery2019

Persistent Opioid Use and High-Risk Prescribing in Body Contouring Patients.

Katelyn G Bennett, Brian P Kelley, Alexis D Vick, Jay S Lee, Vidhya Gunaseelan, Chad M Brummett, Jennifer F Waljee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Hospital and long-term opioid use according to analgosedation with fentanyl vs. morphine: Findings from the ANALGESIC trial.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Reducing Opioid Overprescribing through Procedure-specific Prescribing Guidelines.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Basics and Best Practices of Multimodal Pain Management for the Plastic Surgeon.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Katelyn G BennettFrom the Section of Plastic Surgery, Departments of Surgery and Orthopedic Surgery, the Section of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, the Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan; and the University of Toledo School College of Medicine and Life Sciences.
Brian P KelleyFrom the Section of Plastic Surgery, Departments of Surgery and Orthopedic Surgery, the Section of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, the Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan; and the University of Toledo School College of Medicine and Life Sciences.
Alexis D VickFrom the Section of Plastic Surgery, Departments of Surgery and Orthopedic Surgery, the Section of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, the Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan; and the University of Toledo School College of Medicine and Life Sciences.
Jay S LeeFrom the Section of Plastic Surgery, Departments of Surgery and Orthopedic Surgery, the Section of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, the Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan; and the University of Toledo School College of Medicine and Life Sciences.
Vidhya GunaseelanFrom the Section of Plastic Surgery, Departments of Surgery and Orthopedic Surgery, the Section of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, the Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan; and the University of Toledo School College of Medicine and Life Sciences.
Chad M BrummettFrom the Section of Plastic Surgery, Departments of Surgery and Orthopedic Surgery, the Section of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, the Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan; and the University of Toledo School College of Medicine and Life Sciences.
Jennifer F WaljeeFrom the Section of Plastic Surgery, Departments of Surgery and Orthopedic Surgery, the Section of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, the Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan; and the University of Toledo School College of Medicine and Life Sciences.

Funding

Psychopathology, Disordered Eating, and Impulsivity as Predictors of Outcomes of Bariatric SurgeryR01DK108628 · NIDDK · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI SARWER, DAVID B · 2015 to 2019
$2.1M
The PROMIS-Face: Extending PROMIS to Measure Pediatric Facial AppearanceF32DE027604 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BENNETT, KATELYN GREER · 2017 to 2018
$128k
NIDCR NIH HHS F32 DE027604NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK108628
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOpioid misuse occurs commonly among obese patients and after bariatric surgery. However, the risk of new persistent use following postbariatric body contouring procedures remains unknown.

methodsThe authors examined insurance claims from Clinformatics Data Mart (OptumInsight, Eden Prairie, Minn.) between 2001 and 2015 for opioid-naive patients undergoing five body contouring procedures: abdominoplasty/panniculectomy, breast reduction, mastopexy, brachioplasty, and thighplasty (n = 11,257). Their primary outcomes included both new persistent opioid use, defined as continued prescription fills between 90 and 180 days after surgery, and the prevalence of high-risk prescribing. They used multilevel logistic regression to assess the risk of new persistent use, adjusting for relevant covariates.

resultsIn this cohort, 6.1 percent of previously opioid-naive patients developed new persistent use, and 12.9 percent were exposed to high-risk prescribing. New persistent use was higher in patients with high-risk prescribing (9.2 percent). New persistent use was highest after thighplasty (17.7 percent; 95 percent CI, 0.03 to 0.33). Increasing Charlson comorbidity indices (OR, 1.11; 95 percent CI, 1.05 to 1.17), mood disorders (OR, 1.27; 95 percent CI, 1.05 to 1.54), anxiety (OR, 1.41; 95 percent CI, 1.16 to 1.73), tobacco use (OR, 1.22; 95 percent CI, 1.00 to 1.49), neck pain (OR, 1.23; 95 percent CI, 1.04 to 1.46), arthritis (OR, 1.30; 95 percent CI, 1.08 to 1.58), and other pain disorders (OR, 1.36; 95 percent CI, 1.16 to 1.60) were independently associated with persistent use.

conclusionsSimilar to other elective procedures, 6 percent of opioid-naive patients developed persistent use, and 12 percent were exposed to high-risk prescribing practices. Plastic surgeons should remain aware of risk factors and offer opioid alternatives. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnalgesics, OpioidBariatric SurgeryBody ContouringCohort StudiesDatabases, FactualDrug UtilizationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisObesity, MorbidAnalgesics, Opioid

Identifiers

PMID30589779
PMCPMC6311715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.