Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30589753›Full record

Trial reportThe journal of trauma and acute care surgery2019

Indocyanine green dye angiography as an adjunct to assess indeterminate burn wounds: A prospective, multicentered, triple-blinded study.

Apinut Wongkietkachorn, Palakorn Surakunprapha, Kengkart Winaikosol, Sakda Waraasawapati, Surachat Chaiwiriyakul, Kant Eua-Angkanakul, Nuttapone Wongkietkachorn, Pattama Punyavong, Kamonwan Jenwitheesuk, Bowornsilp Chowchuen

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in The journal of trauma and acute care surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. [Research advances on the techniques for diagnosing burn wound depth].Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Apinut WongkietkachornFrom the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery (A.W.), Faculty of Medicine, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery (P.S., K.W., P.P., K.J., B.C.), Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine (S.W., S.C.), Khon Kaen University; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery (K.E.), Khon Kaen Hospital, Khon Kaen; and Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery (N.W.), Q Clinic, Bangkok, Thailand.
Palakorn Surakunprapha
Kengkart Winaikosol
Sakda Waraasawapati
Surachat Chaiwiriyakul
Kant Eua-Angkanakul
Nuttapone Wongkietkachorn
Pattama Punyavong
Kamonwan Jenwitheesuk
Bowornsilp Chowchuen
Bridge University · SS

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical assessment of indeterminate burn wounds has been reported to yield poor accuracy, even when performed by burn experts. Indocyanine green (ICG) dye angiography has been found to be highly accurate in assessing burn depth, but there is still limited evidence of its use in indeterminate burn wounds. This study aims to compare the accuracy of ICG angiography to that of clinical assessment in assessing indeterminate burn wounds.

methodsThis is a prospective, multicentered, triple-blinded, experimental study. Participants were stable patients, admitted to the hospital with burn wounds of indeterminate depth. The burn wounds were clinically assessed by an attending plastic surgeon. ICG angiography was performed and evaluated by another surgeon. Tissue biopsies were obtained and sent for histological study to be assessed as the gold standard.

resultsIn the 30 burn sites that were assessed, the accuracy of ICG angiography was 100.0%, compared with 50.0% for clinical assessment (p < 0.001). Clinical assessment yielded a sensitivity of 33.3% and specificity of 66.7%, while ICG angiography yielded both a sensitivity and specificity of 100.0%. Therefore, the number needed to treat for using ICG angiography in indeterminate burn wounds was two.

conclusionIndocyanine green angiography yields a significantly higher accuracy than clinical assessment in indeterminate burn wounds. This intervention can, thus, be a useful tool to aid clinical judgment.

trial registrationThai Clinical Trials Registry, number TCTR20170821001. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic test, level I.

Indexed as

Coloring AgentsIndocyanine GreenAdultAngiographyBurnsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsColoring AgentsIndocyanine Green

Identifiers

PMID30589753
PMCPMC6493689
OpenAlexW2907400640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.