Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30589628›Full record

SynthesisJournal of managed care & specialty pharmacy2019

Factors Affecting Health Care Provider Knowledge and Acceptance of Biosimilar Medicines: A Systematic Review.

Emily Leonard, Michael Wascovich, Sonia Oskouei, Paula Gurz, Delesha Carpenter

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 96 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
96citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

96 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Biosimilar monoclonal antibodies for cancer treatment in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Patients' perspectives on the relevance of biosimilars' outcomes in oncology: qualitative study with nominal group technique.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Patients' Perceptions of Biosimilars: A Systematic Review.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Pharmacists' Perspectives of Biosimilars: A Systematic Review.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2022
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Comparing the pharmacokinetics of adalimumab originator and biosimilar product in patients with Inflammatory bowel disease or autoimmune disease.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

36 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Emily Leonard1 Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Michael Wascovich2 Pharmacy Services, Generics, Biosimilars, Premier, Charlotte, North Carolina.
Sonia Oskouei3 Pharmacy Program Development (Biosimilars), Generics, Biosimilars, Premier, Charlotte, North Carolina.
Paula Gurz4 Pharmacy Contracting, Generics, Biosimilars, Premier, Charlotte, North Carolina.
Delesha Carpenter1 Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNewly developed biosimilar agents confer significant cost-saving advantages, yielding the potential to mitigate rising drug costs and expand patient access to care for important biologic therapies. Biosimilar market uptake greatly depends on health care provider willingness to promote, prescribe, and use biosimilars in clinical practice.

objectiveTo perform a systematic review evaluating current U.S. and European health care provider knowledge, perceptions, and prescribing behaviors of biosimilar medicines to assess the need for clinician-directed biosimilar education.

methodsAn electronic literature search was conducted using journal databases, including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Terms related to biosimilar agents, survey questionnaires, and education were used. Two independent reviewers evaluated 158 citations published from January 1, 2014, to March 5, 2018 that were the result of this search. Studies in English were included if they surveyed U.S. or European physician and/or pharmacist knowledge, attitudes, and/or prescribing preferences of biosimilar drugs. Overall trends in prescribing behavior and perceptions were abstracted.

resultsA total of 20 studies met inclusion criteria. Three studies originated from the United States and 17 were from Europe. Hospital specialists, gastroenterologists, and rheumatologists were the most frequently surveyed practitioners. The percentage of biosimilar prescribing varied widely between countries and within similar practice fields. If used, biosimilars were predominantly prescribed in biologic treatment-naive patients. An overall lack of biosimilar familiarity in U.S. and European health care settings accompanied concerns about biosimilar safety, efficacy, extrapolation, and interchangeability. Detailed descriptions of biosimilar education programs were lacking within the literature.

conclusionsFindings from this review indicate that U.S. and European health care providers still approach biosimilar medicines with caution, citing limited biosimilar knowledge, low prescribing comfort, and safety and efficacy concerns as main deterrents for biosimilar use. To realize the full cost-saving potential of biosimilar medicines, clinician-directed biosimilar education will be imperative to address gaps in biosimilar knowledge, facilitate prescribing changes, and ultimately increase biosimilar use. DISCLOSURES: No outside funding supported this study. The authors have nothing to disclose.

Indexed as

Biosimilar PharmaceuticalsClinical CompetenceDrug PrescriptionsEuropeHumansPhysiciansProfessional PracticeTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesBiosimilar Pharmaceuticals

Identifiers

PMID30589628
PMCPMC10397692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.