SynthesisJournal of managed care & specialty pharmacy2019
Factors Affecting Health Care Provider Knowledge and Acceptance of Biosimilar Medicines: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 96 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
96 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Biosimilar monoclonal antibodies for cancer treatment in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Patients' perspectives on the relevance of biosimilars' outcomes in oncology: qualitative study with nominal group technique.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023Pooled it
- Patients' Perceptions of Biosimilars: A Systematic Review.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2023Pooled it
- Pharmacists' Perspectives of Biosimilars: A Systematic Review.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2022Pooled it
- Efficacy and immunogenicity of insulin biosimilar compared to their reference products: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC endocrine disorders · 2022Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Application of Actor Network Theory to Evaluate Supply and Demand Strategies Used to Encourage International Biosimilar Uptake.Pharmaceutical medicine · 2026Review
- Early real-world utilization of ADA-adaz (Hyrimoz) in the United States: A retrospective claims-based descriptive study.Medicine · 2026Article
- Financial Toxicity Associated with Biological Medicines: A Scoping Review.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Article
- Comparing the pharmacokinetics of adalimumab originator and biosimilar product in patients with Inflammatory bowel disease or autoimmune disease.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2026Article
- Assessing Nurses' Knowledge and Attitudes Towards Biosimilars: Results from a National Survey.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Perceptions and clinical use of biosimilars among rheumatologists in ArLAR countries: a cross-sectional survey.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Toward Regulatory Convergence and Streamlined Biosimilar Development: Recommendations from an International Qualitative Study.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2025Article
- Temporal Trends in the Prescription of Biosimilars and the Status of Switching from Original Biologics to Biosimilars at Individual and Institutional Levels in Japan.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2025Article
- Review
- Biosimilar Policies and Their Impact on Market Penetration of Adalimumab, Etanercept and Infliximab: A Policy Synthesis and Descriptive Analysis in 13 OECD Countries.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2025Article
- The Path to Accessible Care: Development and Impact of Eculizumab Biosimilars for Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria and Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2025Review
- Emerging trends in therapeutics and diagnostics: Perspectives on the 2024 AMCP Foundation Survey.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2025Article
- Biosimilars in practice: Discriminant factors influencing prescription decisions among physicians in Thailand.PloS one · 2025Article
- From Conventional to Advanced Therapies: A National Health Registry Report (2016-2022) on DMARDs in Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatment in Turkey.Biologics : targets & therapy · 2025Article
36 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNewly developed biosimilar agents confer significant cost-saving advantages, yielding the potential to mitigate rising drug costs and expand patient access to care for important biologic therapies. Biosimilar market uptake greatly depends on health care provider willingness to promote, prescribe, and use biosimilars in clinical practice.
objectiveTo perform a systematic review evaluating current U.S. and European health care provider knowledge, perceptions, and prescribing behaviors of biosimilar medicines to assess the need for clinician-directed biosimilar education.
methodsAn electronic literature search was conducted using journal databases, including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Terms related to biosimilar agents, survey questionnaires, and education were used. Two independent reviewers evaluated 158 citations published from January 1, 2014, to March 5, 2018 that were the result of this search. Studies in English were included if they surveyed U.S. or European physician and/or pharmacist knowledge, attitudes, and/or prescribing preferences of biosimilar drugs. Overall trends in prescribing behavior and perceptions were abstracted.
resultsA total of 20 studies met inclusion criteria. Three studies originated from the United States and 17 were from Europe. Hospital specialists, gastroenterologists, and rheumatologists were the most frequently surveyed practitioners. The percentage of biosimilar prescribing varied widely between countries and within similar practice fields. If used, biosimilars were predominantly prescribed in biologic treatment-naive patients. An overall lack of biosimilar familiarity in U.S. and European health care settings accompanied concerns about biosimilar safety, efficacy, extrapolation, and interchangeability. Detailed descriptions of biosimilar education programs were lacking within the literature.
conclusionsFindings from this review indicate that U.S. and European health care providers still approach biosimilar medicines with caution, citing limited biosimilar knowledge, low prescribing comfort, and safety and efficacy concerns as main deterrents for biosimilar use. To realize the full cost-saving potential of biosimilar medicines, clinician-directed biosimilar education will be imperative to address gaps in biosimilar knowledge, facilitate prescribing changes, and ultimately increase biosimilar use. DISCLOSURES: No outside funding supported this study. The authors have nothing to disclose.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.