Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30589103›Full record

ArticleDigestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society2019

Standards of diagnostic colonoscopy for early-stage neoplasia: Recommendations by an Asian private group.

Yasushi Sano, Han-Mo Chiu, Xiao-Bo Li, Supakij Khomvilai, Pises Pisespongsa, Jonard Tan Co, Takuji Kawamura, Nozomu Kobayashi, Shinji Tanaka, David G Hewett and 11 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Colorectal cancer early screening: Dilemmas and solutions.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Image enhanced colonoscopy: updates and prospects-a review.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 16 institutions in 8 countries.

Yasushi SanoGastrointestinal Center and Institute of Minimally invasive Endoscopic Care (iMEC), Sano Hospital, Hyogo.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3352-5757
Han-Mo ChiuDepartment of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Xiao-Bo LiDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Key Laboratory of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ministry of Health, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Disease, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Supakij KhomvilaiSurgical Endoscopy, Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Pises PisespongsaDigestive Disease Center, Bumrungrad International Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Jonard Tan CoSt. Luke's Medical Centre - Global City, Taguig City, Metro Manila, Philippines.
Takuji KawamuraDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kyoto Second Red Cross Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Nozomu KobayashiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tochigi Cancer Center, Tochigi, Japan.
Shinji TanakaDepartment of Endoscopy, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
David G HewettFaculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4529-3543
Yoji TakeuchiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Kenichiro ImaiDivision of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9257-5842
Takahiro UtsumiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Akira TeramotoGastrointestinal Center and Institute of Minimally invasive Endoscopic Care (iMEC), Sano Hospital, Hyogo.
Daizen HirataGastrointestinal Center and Institute of Minimally invasive Endoscopic Care (iMEC), Sano Hospital, Hyogo.
Mineo IwatateGastrointestinal Center and Institute of Minimally invasive Endoscopic Care (iMEC), Sano Hospital, Hyogo.
Rajvinder SinghGastroenterology Unit, Division of Medicine, Lyell McEwin Hospital, School of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Siew C NgDepartments of Medicine and Therapeutics, Institute of Digestive Disease, State Key Laboratory of Digestive Diseases, LKS Institute of Health Science, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Shiaw-Hooi HoDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Philip ChiuSurgery, Institute of Digestive Disease, State Key Laboratory of Digestive Diseases, LKS Institute of Health Science, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9292-112X
Hisao TajiriDepartment of Innovative Interventional Endoscopy Research, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Chinese University of Hong Kong · HKBumrungrad International Hospital · THChulalongkorn University · THHiroshima University Hospital · JPJikei University School of Medicine · JPKyoto first Red Cross hospital · JPKyoto University · JPLyell McEwin Hospital · AUNational Taiwan University · TWOsaka International Cancer Institute · JPShanghai Jiao Tong University · CNShizuoka Cancer Center · JPSt. Luke's Medical Center · PHThe University of Queensland · AUTochigi Cancer Center · JPUniversity of Malaya · MY

Funding

OlympusTakeda Pharmaceutical Company
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimIn recent years, the incidence of colorectal cancer has been increasing, and it is now becoming the major cause of cancer death in Asian countries. The aim of the present study was to develop Asian expert-based consensus to standardize the preparation, detection and characterization for the diagnosis of early-stage colorectal neoplasia.

methodsA professional group was formed by 36 experts of the Asian Novel Bio-Imaging and Intervention Group (ANBI

resultsThrough the three consensus meetings with debating, reviewing the literature and regional data, a consensus was reached at third meeting in 2016. The consensus was reached on a total of 10 statements. Summary of statements is as follows: (i) Adequate bowel preparation for high-quality colonoscopy; (ii) Antispasmodic agents for lesion detection; (iii) Image-enhanced endoscopy (IEE) for polyp detection; (iv) Adenoma detection rate for quality indicators; (v) Good documentation of colonoscopy findings; (vi) Complication rates; (vii) Cecal intubation rate; (viii) Cap-assisted colonoscopy (CAC) for polyp detection; (ix) Macroscopic classification using indigocarmine spray for characterization of colorectal lesions; and (x) IEE and/or magnifying endoscopy for prediction of histology.

conclusionThis consensus provides guidance for carrying out endoscopic diagnosis and characterization for early-stage colorectal neoplasia based on the evidence. This will enhance the quality of endoscopic diagnosis and improve detection of early-stage colorectal neoplasia.

Indexed as

AsiaColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsDelphi TechniqueEarly Detection of CancerHumansIncidenceNeoplasm Staging

Identifiers

PMID30589103
PMCPMC6850515
OpenAlexW2907884965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.