ArticleCancer science2019
Platforms of in vivo genome editing with inducible Cas9 for advanced cancer modeling.
Article in Cancer science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- A versatile in vivo platform for reversible control of transgene expression in adult tissues.Stem cell reports · 2025Article
- The Potential Therapeutic Applications of CRISPR/Cas9 in the Treatment of Gastrointestinal Cancers.Current molecular medicine · 2025Review
- Recent advances of the biological and biomedical applications of CRISPR/Cas systems.Molecular biology reports · 2022Review
- Development of an ObLiGaRe Doxycycline Inducible Cas9 system for pre-clinical cancer drug discovery.Nature communications · 2020Article
- Review
- A collection of genetic mouse lines and related tools for inducible and reversible intersectional mis-expression.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2020Article
- Article
- CRISPR-Switch regulates sgRNA activity by Cre recombination for sequential editing of two loci.Nature communications · 2019Article
- Platforms of in vivo genome editing with inducible Cas9 for advanced cancer modeling.Cancer science · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The emergence of clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)/Cas9 technology has dramatically advanced how we manipulate the genome. Regarding in vivo experiments, Cas9-transgenic animals could provide efficient and complex genome editing. However, this potential has not been fully realized partly due to a lack of convenient platforms and limited examples of successful disease modeling. Here, we devised two doxycycline (Dox)-inducible Cas9 platforms that efficiently enable conditional genome editing at multiple loci in vitro and in vivo. In these platforms, we took advantage of a site-specific multi-segment cloning strategy for rapid and easy integration of multiple single guide (sg)RNAs. We found that a platform containing rtTA at the Rosa26 locus and TRE-Cas9 together with multiple sgRNAs at the Col1a1 locus showed higher efficiency of inducible insertions and deletions (indels) with minimal leaky editing. Using this platform, we succeeded to model Wilms' tumor and the progression of intestinal adenomas with multiple mutations including an activating mutation with a large genomic deletion. Collectively, the established platform should make complicated disease modeling in the mouse easily attainable, extending the range of in vivo experiments in various biological fields including cancer research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.