Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30588603›Full record

ArticleEpilepsia2019

Localization yield and seizure outcome in patients undergoing bilateral SEEG exploration.

Claude Steriade, William Martins, Juan Bulacio, Marcia E Morita-Sherman, Dileep Nair, Ajay Gupta, William Bingaman, Jorge Gonzalez-Martinez, Imad Najm, Lara Jehi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epilepsia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Perisylvian vulnerability to postencephalitic epilepsy.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2020
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Claude SteriadeEpilepsy Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.
William MartinsEpilepsy Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.
Juan BulacioEpilepsy Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.
Marcia E Morita-ShermanEpilepsy Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.
Dileep NairEpilepsy Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.
Ajay GuptaEpilepsy Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.
William BingamanEpilepsy Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.
Jorge Gonzalez-MartinezEpilepsy Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.
Imad NajmEpilepsy Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.
Lara JehiEpilepsy Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.

Funding

A Nomogram to Predict Seizure Outcomes After Resective Epilepsy SurgeryR01NS097719 · NINDS · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI JEHI, LARA · 2017 to 2021
$3.6M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS097719
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe aimed to determine the rates and predictors of resection and seizure freedom after bilateral stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) implantation.

methodsWe reviewed 184 patients who underwent bilateral SEEG implantation (2009-2015). Noninvasive and invasive evaluation findings were collected. Outcomes of interest included subsequent resection and seizure freedom. Statistical analyses employed multivariable logistic regression and proportional hazard modeling. Preoperative and postoperative seizure frequency, severity, and quality of life scales were also compared.

resultsFollowing bilateral SEEG implantation, 106 of 184 patients (58%) underwent resection. Single seizure type (P = 0.007), a family history of epilepsy (P = 0.003), 10 or more seizures per month (P = 0.004), lower number of electrodes (P = 0.02), or sentinel electrode placement (P = 0.04) was predictive of undergoing a resection, as were lack of nonlocalized (P < 0.0001) or bilateral (P < 0.0001) ictal-onset zones on SEEG. Twenty-six of 81 patients (32% with follow-up greater than 1 year) remained seizure-free. Predictors of seizure freedom were single seizure type (P = 0.01), short epilepsy duration (P = 0.008), use of 2 or fewer antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) at the time of surgery (P = 0.0006), primary localization hypothesis involving the frontal lobe (P = 0.002), sentinel electrode placement only (P = 0.02), and lack of overlap between ictal-onset zone and eloquent cortex (P = 0.04), along with epilepsy substrate histopathology (P = 0.007). Complete resection of a suspected focal cortical dysplasia showed a trend to increased likelihood of seizure freedom (P = 0.09). The 44 of 55 patients (80%) who underwent resection and experienced seizure recurrence had >50% seizure reduction, as opposed to 26 of 45 patients (58%) who continued medical therapy alone (P = 0.003). Seventy-two percent of patients had a clinically meaningful quality of life improvement (>10% decrease in the Quality of Life in Epilepsy [QOLIE-10] score) at 1 year. SIGNIFICANCE: A strong preimplantation hypothesis of a suspected unifocal epilepsy increases the odds of resection and seizure freedom. We discuss a tailored approach, taking into account localization hypothesis and suspected epilepsy etiology in guiding implantation and subsequent surgical strategy.

Indexed as

Electrodes, ImplantedStereotaxic TechniquesAdolescentAdultAgedChildChild, PreschoolElectroencephalographyEpilepsies, PartialFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSeizuresYoung Adultepilepsyintracranial EEGoutcomestereo-electroencephalographysurgery

Identifiers

PMID30588603
PMCPMC6510950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.