ArticleNeurology. Clinical practice2018
The COAST stroke advance directive: A novel approach to preserving patient autonomy.
Article in Neurology. Clinical practice, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Shared Decision-Making for Patients with Stroke in Neurocritical Care: A Qualitative Meta-Synthesis.Neurocritical care · 2025Pooled it
- Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage and Clinical Decision-Making: A Qualitative Pilot Study Exploring Perspectives of Those Directly Affected, Their Next of Kin, and Treating Clinicians.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Advance consent for participation in randomised controlled trials for emergency conditions: a scoping review.BMJ open · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Within the field of neurology, there has been limited discussion of how to best respect patient autonomy in patients presenting with an acute stroke, who often have impairments in language and cognition. In addition to performing a detailed neurologic examination and providing a thorough timeline of their current presentation and medical history, these patients and their families are then asked to quickly make critical medical decisions regarding acute stroke therapies (thrombolysis and endovascular therapy). These discussions are often limited by time constraints and inadequate opportunities for patient education regarding acute stroke care. This article discusses some of the challenges of preserving patient autonomy in patients presenting with acute stroke and the advent of a stroke advance directive (Coordinating Options for Acute Stroke Therapy [COAST]) aimed to overcome these obstacles.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.