Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30588288›Full record

ArticleComparative cytogenetics2018

Pilot satellitome analysis of the model plant,

Ilya Kirov, Marina Gilyok, Andrey Knyazev, Igor Fesenko

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Comparative cytogenetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
10.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The nature and organization of satellite DNAs inFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  11. A Pipeline NanoTRF as a New Tool forPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ilya KirovLaboratory of functional genomics and proteomics of plants, Shemyakin and Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Moscow, Russian Federation Shemyakin and Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry Moscow Russia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3885-3837
Marina GilyokLaboratory of functional genomics and proteomics of plants, Shemyakin and Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Moscow, Russian Federation Shemyakin and Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry Moscow Russia.
Andrey KnyazevLaboratory of functional genomics and proteomics of plants, Shemyakin and Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Moscow, Russian Federation Shemyakin and Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry Moscow Russia.
Igor FesenkoLaboratory of functional genomics and proteomics of plants, Shemyakin and Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Moscow, Russian Federation Shemyakin and Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry Moscow Russia.
Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Satellite DNA (satDNA) constitutes a substantial part of eukaryotic genomes. In the last decade, it has been shown that satDNA is not an inert part of the genome and its function extends beyond the nuclear membrane. However, the number of model plant species suitable for studying the novel horizons of satDNA functionality is low. Here, we explored the satellitome of the model "basal" plant,

Indexed as

Bryophytachromosomesfluorescence in situ hybridizationlong non-coding RNAsPhyscomitrella patensrDNAsatellite DNA

Identifiers

PMID30588288
PMCPMC6302065
OpenAlexW2904506054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.